2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous pose, correspondence and non-rigid shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along these lines we will take advantage of recent descriptors such as [24] or the DaLI [11]. The latter, is specially interesting because it will let us bring our approach from a rigid to a deformable domain, like in [18,20], but without the strong assumption of having to know the camera calibration parameters in advance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along these lines we will take advantage of recent descriptors such as [24] or the DaLI [11]. The latter, is specially interesting because it will let us bring our approach from a rigid to a deformable domain, like in [18,20], but without the strong assumption of having to know the camera calibration parameters in advance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other problems in geometric computer vision, such as Simultaneous Pose and Correspondence [24,28,31], Fundamental matrix computation [2,14] , ellipse fitting [2,13,15,17], do take into account specific models of uncertainty per observed point. In most these approaches, the uncertainty is modeled by a covariance matrix, and Maximum Likelihood strategies are proposed to minimize the Mahalanobis distances between the noisy and the true locations of the point observations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of the affine-invariant descriptors when solving correspondences between images of objects that have undergone non-rigid deformations are compensated by enforcing global consistency, both spatial and photometric, among all features [4,5,12,13,24,40,41,47], or introducing segmentation information within the descriptor itself [48,49]. In any event, none of these methods specifically handles the non-rigid nature of the problem, and they rely on solving complex optimization functions for establishing matches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to match points of interest under non-rigid image transformations, recent approaches propose optimizing complex objective functions that enforce global consistency in the spatial layout of all matches [12,13,24,40,41,47]. Yet, none of these approaches explicitly builds a descriptor that goes beyond invariance to affine transformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%