2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-01000-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and methylation on human cell lines with nanopore sequencing

Abstract: Probing epigenetic features on DNA has tremendous potential to advance our understanding of the phased epigenome. In this study, we use nanopore sequencing to evaluate CpG methylation and chromatin accessibility simultaneously on long strands of DNA by applying GpC methyltransferase to exogenously label open chromatin. We performed nanopore sequencing of Nucleosome Occupancy and Methylome (nanoNOMe) on four human cell lines (GM12878, MCF-10A, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231). The single-molecule resolution allows footprinti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
181
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
10
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With our nanoNOMe data accurately aligned to this region, we measured both chromatin accessibility and methylation, using reads greater than 20 kb to achieve a sequencing depth of 40X ( Fig S15f ). In this method, we use M.CviPI methyltransferase to decorate accessible chromatin with exogenous GpC methylation ( 17 ); using GpC sites we can then measure chromatin accessibility along with CpG methylation of the HG002 sequencing reads aligned to the HG002 chromosome X centromere assembly. Examining methylation we clearly observe a CDR in the HG002 chromosome X HOR region ( Fig 4a,b) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With our nanoNOMe data accurately aligned to this region, we measured both chromatin accessibility and methylation, using reads greater than 20 kb to achieve a sequencing depth of 40X ( Fig S15f ). In this method, we use M.CviPI methyltransferase to decorate accessible chromatin with exogenous GpC methylation ( 17 ); using GpC sites we can then measure chromatin accessibility along with CpG methylation of the HG002 sequencing reads aligned to the HG002 chromosome X centromere assembly. Examining methylation we clearly observe a CDR in the HG002 chromosome X HOR region ( Fig 4a,b) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methylation caller generates a log-likelihood value for the ratio of probability of methylated to unmethylated CpGs at a specific k -mer. We filtered methylation calls using the nanopore_methylation_utilities tool ( https://github.com/isaclee/nanopore-methylation-utilities ) 53 , which uses a log-likelihood ratio of 2.5 as a threshold for calling methylation. CpG sites with log-likelihood ratios greater than 2.5 (methylated) or less than −2.5 (unmethylated) are considered high quality and included in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prerequisite for these studies will be the generation of single molecule nucleosome configuration data as in Brown et al, 2013 at different time points of chromatin opening. It should be noted that such data are nowadays much easier to obtain than by the psoralen-TEM approach of Brown et al, 2013 due to the recent development of single molecule long-read sequencing of DNA methylation footprints ( Shipony et al, 2020 ; Stergachis et al, 2020 ; Lee et al, 2020 ; Oberbeckmann et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second line of studies may investigate the opening and closing dynamics in the wild-type scenario in more detail. We argued that the experimentally observed faster closing than opening is consistent with regulation by assembly and inconsistent with regulation by disassembly (see Stergachis et al, 2020;Lee et al, 2020;Oberbeckmann et al, 2019).…”
Section: Experimentally Testable Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 93%