2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-007-0034-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous removal of chromium and organic pollutants in tannery wastewater by electroprecipitation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The COD removal efficiency of the Ti/RuO 2 electrodes in this study is comparable with the report of Panizza and Cerisola (2004) using a Ti/RuO 2 electrode, which had a removal efficiency of 90% after 12 h of electrolysis at current density of 60 mA/cm 2 and input COD 2100 mg/L. Kongjao et al (2007) showed that the COD removal efficiency of Ti/RuO 2 electrodes in tanning effluents using an input concentration of 17,240-17,860 mg/L gave a high efficiency of 82% at current density 60.5 mA/cm 2 after 1 h of electrolysis. The main mechanism of pollutant treatment using a Ti/ RuO 2 electrode is based on indirect electrolysis, so the direct oxidation on the electrode surface is negligible (Luu et al 2019a, b).…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The COD removal efficiency of the Ti/RuO 2 electrodes in this study is comparable with the report of Panizza and Cerisola (2004) using a Ti/RuO 2 electrode, which had a removal efficiency of 90% after 12 h of electrolysis at current density of 60 mA/cm 2 and input COD 2100 mg/L. Kongjao et al (2007) showed that the COD removal efficiency of Ti/RuO 2 electrodes in tanning effluents using an input concentration of 17,240-17,860 mg/L gave a high efficiency of 82% at current density 60.5 mA/cm 2 after 1 h of electrolysis. The main mechanism of pollutant treatment using a Ti/ RuO 2 electrode is based on indirect electrolysis, so the direct oxidation on the electrode surface is negligible (Luu et al 2019a, b).…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, the COD removal efficiencies in this study were matched with the research of Panizza and Cerisola (2004) when using a Ti/RuO 2 electrode, which provided 90.0% COD removal efficiency after 12 h of electrolysis at a current density of 60.0 mA/cm 2 (input COD 2100.3 mg/L). Kongjao et al (2007) reported that the COD removal efficiency of Ti/ RuO 2 electrodes in tanning wastewater was 82.0% at current density 66.7 mA/cm 2 after 1 h of electrolysis at an initial concentration of 17,240.2-17,860.8 mg/L.…”
Section: Effect Of Current Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a growing number of studies regarding the removal of heavy metals and organic contaminants using different treatment technologies [86], very few publications address the simultaneous removal of different types of pollutants in real context scenarios, such as complex industrial effluents. Among the different strategies adopted for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals and organic pollutants that have been reported in literature, namely adsorption processes [87,88], photocatalysis [89,90], electroremediation [91,92] and biological processes [46,93], the last present important advantageous due to the possibility for heavy metals recovery, cost-effectiveness and regeneration of the biosorbents used [94]. Although the use of biological processes is associated with some limitations, for instance not all microorganisms have the ability to breakdown any pollutants, as well as the inhibition of growth due to the presence of toxic pollutants, in this work that limitations were overcome since the developed permeable bio-barrier revealed to be efficient on the simultaneous removal of ketones and heavy metals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For BOD, close to 100% removal of BOD was attained by employing a UV-A power of 90 W for 20 min, as opposed to ~70% at 60 W, but further increasing the UV-A intensity above 90 W decreased the level of BOD removal attained. This may be due to the reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ according to reactions (3) and (4) at higher UV-A levels where the Fe 2+ species can react with the dissolved oxygen leading to a decrease in the amount of dissolved oxygen in the treated wastewater as displayed by reaction (10) [28]. Therefore, a UV-A power of 90 W was deemed to be the optimum for treating textile wastewater by the photo-oxidation process in a continuous stirred tank reactor.…”
Section: -1 Effect Of Uv Powermentioning
confidence: 99%