2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous removal of SO2, NO and Hg0 from flue gas by ferrate (VI) solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to be close to the actual industrial environment, the temperature conditions of a typical coal-fired power plant were used as a reference. This consists of flue gas temperatures from the tail of a power boiler of approximately 800-900°C; after passing through the economizer, air preheater and electrostatic precipitation apparatus, the inlet FGD-CFB flue gas temperatures are 140-160°C [14], resulting in an outlet temperature of approximately 70°C. Accordingly, a series of experiments with different reaction temperatures were carried out.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Temperature On the Simultaneous Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to be close to the actual industrial environment, the temperature conditions of a typical coal-fired power plant were used as a reference. This consists of flue gas temperatures from the tail of a power boiler of approximately 800-900°C; after passing through the economizer, air preheater and electrostatic precipitation apparatus, the inlet FGD-CFB flue gas temperatures are 140-160°C [14], resulting in an outlet temperature of approximately 70°C. Accordingly, a series of experiments with different reaction temperatures were carried out.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Temperature On the Simultaneous Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the methods for simultaneous removal of SO 2 , NO and Hg 0 have been extensively researched in recent years. Many reagents such as Fe(II)-EDTA [10], Co(NH 3 ) 6 3+ [11], KMnO 4 [12], CO(NH 2 ) 2 [13], K 2 FeO 4 [14], NaClO 2 [15] and H 2 O 2 [16,17] etc., have been used to simultaneously remove SO 2 , NO and Hg 0 . Nevertheless, most of these cannot be developed for industrial use due to the technical and economic problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, fly ash would need to be removed by electrostatic precipitators (ESP) or fabric filters (FF) prior to the FGD, and N 2 seldom reacts with other matter. Our recent experimental studies [24] show that an amount of SO 2 in flue gas is to the benefit of removing Hg 0 . The promoting action of SO 2 on Hg 0 removal may be attributed to the complex of HgÁS(IV).…”
Section: Other Effects and Industrial Feasibility Prospectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the adoption of Fe(VI) absorbent can avoid this undesirable feature, because SO 2 is oxidized by Fe(VI) completely, and the products are dominated by sulfate radicals and rare sulfite species [24]. In addition, sulfate ions could be contributing to the formation of a small amount of mercury sulfate which then precipitates with the gypsum particles or decomposes in HgO(s).…”
Section: Other Effects and Industrial Feasibility Prospectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ferrate(VI) is one of the most powerful, multipurpose, environmentally friendly water and wastewater treatment chemicals. Ferrate(VI) has been used effectively for wastewater treatment so far by many researchers [23][24][25]. Due to its unique properties, ferrate(VI) production methods are rather important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%