2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-014-2841-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Separation and Determination of 22 Coumarin Derivatives in Cosmetics by UPLC-MS/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, with lower LOQs, the developed method is suitable for coumarin determination (for other derivatives, there are no limits) in deodorants and antiperspirants of all types including fragranced body sprays (Guidance for the use of IFRA standards, 2019; EU Council Directive No 76/768/EEC). LOQs of coumarins in this study was lower than those reported in literature (32-45 ng mL -1 for simple coumarins by HPLC-DAD (Xiongfeng et al,20l6); 0.17 mg kg -1 for 6-methylcoumarin by HPLC-DAD, 5.0 mg kg -1 by GC-FID (Liu et al, 2018)), although the LOQs obtained by fluorescence detection are slightly higher than that obtained by the HPLC-MS/MS methods (0.5-2 ng mL -1 for 22 coumarin derivatives (Ma et al, 2015)). The recovery values of 70-97 % were obtained (RSD % 4.1-6.4) for sample 3 spiked with two substances concentration levels, confirming the applicability and good precision of the presented method.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, with lower LOQs, the developed method is suitable for coumarin determination (for other derivatives, there are no limits) in deodorants and antiperspirants of all types including fragranced body sprays (Guidance for the use of IFRA standards, 2019; EU Council Directive No 76/768/EEC). LOQs of coumarins in this study was lower than those reported in literature (32-45 ng mL -1 for simple coumarins by HPLC-DAD (Xiongfeng et al,20l6); 0.17 mg kg -1 for 6-methylcoumarin by HPLC-DAD, 5.0 mg kg -1 by GC-FID (Liu et al, 2018)), although the LOQs obtained by fluorescence detection are slightly higher than that obtained by the HPLC-MS/MS methods (0.5-2 ng mL -1 for 22 coumarin derivatives (Ma et al, 2015)). The recovery values of 70-97 % were obtained (RSD % 4.1-6.4) for sample 3 spiked with two substances concentration levels, confirming the applicability and good precision of the presented method.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixture of an organic solvent and aqueous acid solution with gradient elution is often chosen as the mobile phase. A spectrophotometric detector, fluorescent detector (Hroboňová et al, 2013) or a mass spectrometric detector (Ma et al, 2015) are used to detect coumarins. An important part of chemical analysis is the preparation of samples to remove interferences from the matrix and to obtain a fraction of the sample or the final analyte extract in a solvent compatible with the analytical technique used, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, analytes are recovered by elution in a solvent [ 78 ]. However, its application to cosmetics analysis usually requires a previous sample pre-treatment, mainly performed by simple dilution in water [ 42 , 45 , 50 ] or an organic solvent such as MeOH to obtain a liquid phase [ 43 , 46 ]. Undoubtedly, the sorbent selection is critical to obtain a successful SPE method since it plays an important role in the efficiency and analyte selectivity.…”
Section: Sample Preparation Strategies For Cosmetics Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercial reversed-phase water-wettable polymer N-vinylpyrrolidone-DVB sorbent, commonly known as Oasis HLB ® , presents a hydrophilic–lipophilic balance, thus it can be used for acidic, basic and neutral analytes. Oasis HLB ® has been employed to extract coumarin derivatives from cosmetics [ 43 ]. Analysis was performed by LC–MS/MS, obtaining recoveries between 80 and 93% and LODs lower than 20 ng g −1 .…”
Section: Sample Preparation Strategies For Cosmetics Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although classical LLE and solid–liquid extraction (SLE) are broadly used in cosmetic analysis , the simpler, faster and greener procedures are being developed. Solvent extraction (SE) approach for isolating organic substances have turned into ultrasound‐assisted extraction (USAE) , accelerated SE , dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) , SPE , matrix solid‐phase dispersion (MSPD) , and SPME . Classical distillation for separating volatile organic compounds from sample matrices has been grown into rapid distillation , and further replaced by purge and trap , headspace single‐drop microextraction (HS‐SDME) or headspace SPME (HS‐SPME) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%