2016
DOI: 10.9734/bjpr/2016/26586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Determination of Diflunisal and Diclofenac Sodium in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form Using Chemometric Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the analytical parameters of the designed sensor with the previously reported sensors for the individual and simultaneous determination of the PAR, DIC, and ORP is given in Table . ,,,,,,, The stripping method apart from its requirement of surface amendment of the electrode and preaccumulation steps present better analysis than other techniques. , , The LOD values for the target drugs attainable using the presented scheme are lower than the WHO-suggested limits , and those obtained by other sensors. Thus, our designed electrochemical nanosensor is highly promising in the context of sensitivity, selectivity, and stability than many metal/metal oxides NPs, carbon polyhedrons/shells, organic ligands, graphene, silica, inorganic/organic polymers, and their composites based on formerly reported sensors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of the analytical parameters of the designed sensor with the previously reported sensors for the individual and simultaneous determination of the PAR, DIC, and ORP is given in Table . ,,,,,,, The stripping method apart from its requirement of surface amendment of the electrode and preaccumulation steps present better analysis than other techniques. , , The LOD values for the target drugs attainable using the presented scheme are lower than the WHO-suggested limits , and those obtained by other sensors. Thus, our designed electrochemical nanosensor is highly promising in the context of sensitivity, selectivity, and stability than many metal/metal oxides NPs, carbon polyhedrons/shells, organic ligands, graphene, silica, inorganic/organic polymers, and their composites based on formerly reported sensors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The methods recommended by British Pharmacopoeia for drugs determination involve aqueous and nonaqueous titrations. For specific/selective determination of the drugs, some analytical methods such as titrimetry, UV–vis spectrophotometry, capillary electrophoresis, high-performance liquid chromatography, fluorimetry, flow-injection analysis, and chemiluminescence are employed. Though some of these techniques offer high selectivity and accuracy, the associated high cost, need for skilled operators, and tedious workup limit their applications. , To the best of our knowledge, there are no published reports about an effective method for the simultaneous femtomolar voltammetric determination of paracetamol, diclofenac, and orphenadrine (PAR, DIC, and ORP, respectively) in pharmaceutical forms or biological fluids. Keeping these in consideration, the development of simple, cost-effective, and potentially selective electrochemical sensing techniques has gained significant research interest for the simultaneous multianalyte detection .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review for the determination of cited drugs includes spectrophotometry 4-7 , Habib et al 4 developed spectrophotometric methods for determination FEB in concentration range 2-10 µg/mL and DIC 2.5-25 µg/mL, while linear range of Modi et al 5 were 3-15 µg/mL and 6-30 µg/mL for FEB and DIC; respectively, and Derasari et al 6 determined FEB and DIC in concentration range 2-9 µg/mL and 5-22.5 µg/mL for FEB and DIC; respectively, On the other hand, El-Yazbi et al 7 developed spectrophotometric methods for determination of FEB and DIC in linear range 2-14 and 4-18 µg/mL for FEB and DIC; respectively, which give priority of the proposed methods to be determined FEB and DIC in wider range as our linear range 2-20 and 5-50 µg/mL for FEB and DIC; respectively, comparison between the proposed methods and other spectrophotometric reported methods was presented in table 5. The literature review showed also HPTLC and HPLC methods [7][8][9][10] for the determination of cited drugs, El-Yazbi et al developed two HPTLC methods and one HPLC method for determination of FEB and DIC 7-9. In the first one 7 used chloroform-methanol as mobile phase, in [8] used petroleum ether-chloroform-ethyl acetate-formic acid as mobile phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few analytical techniques for simultaneous study of FEB and DIC were found in the literature review. These methods include: spectrophotometry [4][5][6][7] , HPTLC 7,8 and HPLC methods 9, 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%