2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.06.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous stacking of cationic and anionic compounds in single run capillary zone electrophoresis by two-end field amplified sample injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant frustrated flow profile is a superposition of a pluglike profile of EOF and a parabolic profile of pressure driven flow. 12,13 To reduce sample dispersion, EOF is typically suppressed or reduced with application of coating to the microchannel 14 or additive to the BGE. 15 In contrast, there are methodologies which exploit EOF to achieve the desired ion pre-concentration and transport effect [16][17][18] in a micro/nanofluidic channel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant frustrated flow profile is a superposition of a pluglike profile of EOF and a parabolic profile of pressure driven flow. 12,13 To reduce sample dispersion, EOF is typically suppressed or reduced with application of coating to the microchannel 14 or additive to the BGE. 15 In contrast, there are methodologies which exploit EOF to achieve the desired ion pre-concentration and transport effect [16][17][18] in a micro/nanofluidic channel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the EOF is suppressed completely, the physical volume of sample that enters the capillary will be reduced and therefore longer injection times can be used that results in lower LODs. Hou et al recently described a suppressed EOF system to simultaneously stack cationic and anionic compounds in dual opposite end injection CE. Using model cationic (matrine and oxymatrine) and anionic (5‐sulfosalicylic acid) compounds, LODs of 20 and 60 ng/L were obtained for the cationic and anionic model compounds, respectively, an enhancement of 1003–1380.…”
Section: Stackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic extraction was the most frequently used method due to its efficiency and easy manipulation. Indeed, it was employed in about two‐thirds (180 out of 271 articles) of cited references (Supporting Information Tables 1–7) 4–271. Other conventional extraction methods included reflux 6, 14, 15, 21, 45, 74, 84, 87, 97, 117, 121, 123, 131, 134, 157, 162, 164, 169, 171, 172, 176, 179, 182–184, 205, 212, 227, 235, 236, 259, Soxhlet extraction 23, 89, 91, 128, 131, 244, heating extraction 22, 39, 51...…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%