1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(97)00520-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous ultratrace determination of platinum and rhodium by cathodic stripping voltammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation 1 differs from that sug- The results are reported in Table 4. The obtained limit of detection appears noticeably higher than those previously reported, that is 21 pg/L [17] and 0.1 ng/L [34]. Likely, this is due to the effects of the heavy digestion treatments used in this work to analyze real matrices.…”
Section: Limits Of Detection and Of Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Equation 1 differs from that sug- The results are reported in Table 4. The obtained limit of detection appears noticeably higher than those previously reported, that is 21 pg/L [17] and 0.1 ng/L [34]. Likely, this is due to the effects of the heavy digestion treatments used in this work to analyze real matrices.…”
Section: Limits Of Detection and Of Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Noticeably, because of the outstanding sensitivity of the CAdSV method [17,34] the uncertainty of the results of Table 3 (RSD % 20 ± 30%) looks much lower than that calculated by the Horwitz equation [37] (i.e., RSD 90 ± 130% at the same concentration levels). As a matter of fact, as it was recently underlined by Thompson [38,39], the Horwitz equation, developed about twenty years ago is going to be adjusted as a consequence of the progress in chemical instrumentation and methodologies.…”
Section: Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations