“…Nevertheless, the duration of statin use needed to provide the benefits of preventing hepatic decompensation and prolonging survival cannot be determined from the discussed study, as the investigators did not analyze these outcomes for statins taken for more than 3 months. They justified the 3-month time frame based on Abraldes et al [10] who reported a significant reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient after just 1 month of daily simvastatin. Nevertheless, their study leaves open the question of whether long-term use (i.e., years) of a statin provides any ongoing, additional or cumulative benefits compared to relatively short-term use (i.e., months).…”
Section: Improved Outcomes In Cirrhotics On Statinsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As mentioned above, controlled observations support a significant reduction in portal hypertension with statins [10], and antiviral effects of these medications have been increasingly reported [3,14].…”
Section: Biopsy-proven Versus Clinically Diagnosed Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Interestingly, while ascites was observed more often in the control group (31 vs 16 %), the effect on variceal bleeding was the opposite, with a higher rate reported in those taking statins (11 vs 2 %). Since just over one-third of the patients had varices at the time of enrollment, the failure to reduce bleeding from varices was an unexpected and unexplained finding, especially since statins can reduce portal pressure after just 1 month of use [10]. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of developing jaundice or hepatic encephalopathy.…”
Section: Improved Outcomes In Cirrhotics On Statinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Perhaps some patients stopped taking a beta blocker during the course of the study. Such knowledge might also help explain why the risk of variceal hemorrhage was not reduced among the statin users, despite the expected reduction in portal pressure attributed to their use [10]. Yet another limitation of their analysis involved the inability of the investigators to provide information regarding the efficacy of statins on the baseline levels of total cholesterol or LDL, as these data were not collected.…”
Section: Improved Outcomes In Cirrhotics On Statinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it would be easy to call for additional studies to confirm the findings of reduced mortality in cirrhotics receiving a statin before considering their routine use in this setting, the time and effort required to perform such long-term follow-up studies would be substantial. With the current literature supporting safe use in CLD [1][2][3][4]6] as well as substantial clinical benefits [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] with no serious adverse consequences, we already have sufficient evidence to recommend statins in our patients with cirrhosis at this time. As the saying goes, ''The difficult we do immediately.…”
Section: Should Statins Be Routinely Prescribed To Patients With Cirrmentioning
“…Nevertheless, the duration of statin use needed to provide the benefits of preventing hepatic decompensation and prolonging survival cannot be determined from the discussed study, as the investigators did not analyze these outcomes for statins taken for more than 3 months. They justified the 3-month time frame based on Abraldes et al [10] who reported a significant reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient after just 1 month of daily simvastatin. Nevertheless, their study leaves open the question of whether long-term use (i.e., years) of a statin provides any ongoing, additional or cumulative benefits compared to relatively short-term use (i.e., months).…”
Section: Improved Outcomes In Cirrhotics On Statinsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As mentioned above, controlled observations support a significant reduction in portal hypertension with statins [10], and antiviral effects of these medications have been increasingly reported [3,14].…”
Section: Biopsy-proven Versus Clinically Diagnosed Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Interestingly, while ascites was observed more often in the control group (31 vs 16 %), the effect on variceal bleeding was the opposite, with a higher rate reported in those taking statins (11 vs 2 %). Since just over one-third of the patients had varices at the time of enrollment, the failure to reduce bleeding from varices was an unexpected and unexplained finding, especially since statins can reduce portal pressure after just 1 month of use [10]. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of developing jaundice or hepatic encephalopathy.…”
Section: Improved Outcomes In Cirrhotics On Statinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Perhaps some patients stopped taking a beta blocker during the course of the study. Such knowledge might also help explain why the risk of variceal hemorrhage was not reduced among the statin users, despite the expected reduction in portal pressure attributed to their use [10]. Yet another limitation of their analysis involved the inability of the investigators to provide information regarding the efficacy of statins on the baseline levels of total cholesterol or LDL, as these data were not collected.…”
Section: Improved Outcomes In Cirrhotics On Statinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it would be easy to call for additional studies to confirm the findings of reduced mortality in cirrhotics receiving a statin before considering their routine use in this setting, the time and effort required to perform such long-term follow-up studies would be substantial. With the current literature supporting safe use in CLD [1][2][3][4]6] as well as substantial clinical benefits [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] with no serious adverse consequences, we already have sufficient evidence to recommend statins in our patients with cirrhosis at this time. As the saying goes, ''The difficult we do immediately.…”
Section: Should Statins Be Routinely Prescribed To Patients With Cirrmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.