1996
DOI: 10.1007/s001010050251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sind Notarztdiagnosen zuverl�ssig?

Abstract: In the context of quality management measures, a careful evaluation of on-scene diagnoses, therapeutic measures, and decisions made by the emergency physician is a suitable procedure for identifying systematic errors. A high percentage of correct diagnoses and therapy at the emergency site can only be ensured by clinically experienced physicians who constantly deal with patients with acutely life-threatening conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of correct diagnoses in patients with specific complaints was assessed in a previous study at our ED, which showed that correct diagnoses were reached in 87% of patients [27]. This is in line with results from other studies in different settings in Europe [19,28,29]. In contrast to patients with NSCs, checklists and diagnostic algorithms are available for patients with specific complaints, and these have been shown to be useful in preventing diagnostic errors [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The proportion of correct diagnoses in patients with specific complaints was assessed in a previous study at our ED, which showed that correct diagnoses were reached in 87% of patients [27]. This is in line with results from other studies in different settings in Europe [19,28,29]. In contrast to patients with NSCs, checklists and diagnostic algorithms are available for patients with specific complaints, and these have been shown to be useful in preventing diagnostic errors [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In our study, we observed that 90.6% of the preliminary diagnoses made in the emergency department remained unchanged at patient discharge. This is consistent with the literature and demonstrates the effectiveness of the diagnostic methods used in the emergency department [3][4][5]. This success is even more remarkable when we evaluate it together with the department and diagnosis diversity we see in both tables (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, it was noted that in 33% of cases, the patients' admissions to the wards had to be altered. In the study by Arntz et al misdiagnoses that would change the patient's prognosis were found at a similar rate [5]. This is a significant consideration, highlighting the importance of ensuring accurate and definitive diagnoses and admissions from the emergency departments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The reasons for diagnostic discrepancies include, but are not limited to, a switch from a general diagnosis to a more specific one in relevant fields, grossly incorrect initial impressions due to various reasons, an over- or under-estimation of disease severity, and others222325. We discovered that most elderly patients with a diagnostic discrepancy were found to have unrelated diagnoses (39%), while a switch from general to specific diagnosis accounted for 36% of the cases (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A more recent study comparing the diagnoses made by emergency physicians to those made upon discharge discovered that 7% to 10% of admissions contained clinically important diagnostic discrepancies22. Similarly, Heuer et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%