2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
26
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
26
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This question will represent controversy and it will become a matter of debate. In our opinion, in case of weight regain with acceptable follow-up after the primary procedure, a single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI) can be proposed [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question will represent controversy and it will become a matter of debate. In our opinion, in case of weight regain with acceptable follow-up after the primary procedure, a single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI) can be proposed [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of these revisions are in the short term acceptable but there are only few long-term results. In the case of sleeve failure, however, there are more options that include the conversion to an RYGB or into a malabsorptive procedure such as the duodenal switch or a single-anastomosis duodenal-ileale switch (181,182,183,184,185). Similar to the revisions after failed RYGB, the long-term outcome data after failed SG is also strongly limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a few descriptions of SADI-S as a primary- or second-step operation after SG in the literature [17], [18], [19], [20]. The procedure constitutes a simplification of the conventional duodenal switch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the malabsorption the described complications and secondary effects, are predominantly diarrhea and hypoalbuminemia. However surgery is described to be safe and effective [17], [18], the side effects of preserving pylorus and creating a high pressure system remain a challenging disadvantage: GERD can worsen or occur de-novo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%