2010
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single breathhold cardiac CINE imaging with multi‐echo three‐dimensional hybrid radial SSFP acquisition

Abstract: Purpose: To achieve single breathhold whole heart cardiac CINE imaging with improved spatial resolution and temporal resolution by using a multi-echo three-dimensional (3D) hybrid radial SSFP acquisition. Materials and Methods:Multi-echo 3D hybrid radial SSFP acquisitions were used to acquire cardiac CINE imaging within a single breathhold. An optimized interleaving scheme was developed for view ordering throughout the cardiac cycle.Results: Whole heart short axis views were acquired with a spatial resolution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reformatting the one case with an ESV difference outlier (Figure 6 arrows) identified misregistration in the basal slices for 2D multi-breathhold imaging (Figure 7a,b, arrow; Additional file 7) with respect to single-breathhold 3D spiral imaging (Figure 7b,d; Additional file 8). Variable diaphragm position, which affected repeatability studies [4] and has been demonstrated for other 3D cardiac cine imaging strategies [15,16], may have contributed to the discrepancy in ESV between imaging methods. The LV ejection fraction in this sample of healthy volunteers was 62.9 ± 6.0% and 63.0 ± 5.7% (mean ± SD) for 3D spiral and 2D imaging, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reformatting the one case with an ESV difference outlier (Figure 6 arrows) identified misregistration in the basal slices for 2D multi-breathhold imaging (Figure 7a,b, arrow; Additional file 7) with respect to single-breathhold 3D spiral imaging (Figure 7b,d; Additional file 8). Variable diaphragm position, which affected repeatability studies [4] and has been demonstrated for other 3D cardiac cine imaging strategies [15,16], may have contributed to the discrepancy in ESV between imaging methods. The LV ejection fraction in this sample of healthy volunteers was 62.9 ± 6.0% and 63.0 ± 5.7% (mean ± SD) for 3D spiral and 2D imaging, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a five-fold undersampled ECG-gated 3D radial stack of stars trajectory with zero-filling reconstruction and UNFOLD temporal filtering was used to generate 3D cine images from dynamic data with a temporal footprint of 71 ms with a breathhold of 24 RR intervals [15]. Other investigators introduced a 3D multi-echo radial trajectory [16], which obviated the need for angular undersampling and temporal filtering, where data were acquired at 1.3 × 1.3 × 8 mm 3 spatial resolution and 45 ms temporal resolution in a single breathhold of 17 s. This method segmented the projection angle direction across ECG triggers, where the long TR (i.e. 4.5 ms) required both partial Fourier acceleration and a limited partition encoding matrix size to keep the temporal footprint of each cardiac phase under 50 ms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were retrospectively sorted into 20 time frames according to their position in the cardiac cycle. Subsequently, image reconstruction was performed utilizing a compressed sensing reconstruction and a temporal filter for view sharing [16]. To minimize the number of slices needing manual segmentation for measuring ventricular volumes, three contiguous slices were averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach reduces scan time while maintaining excellent spatial resolution. Similarly, steady state free precession SOS imaging is currently used for cardiac exams10-11. Furthermore, radial imaging can also be performed as a 3D volume (vastly undersampled isotropic voxel radial projection imaging – VIPR) producing a spherical acquisition with the highly desirable feature of encompassing a large volume, and in a neurovascular context, whole brain coverage12-13.…”
Section: Basic Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%