2021
DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqab011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell mapper (scMappR): using scRNA-seq to infer the cell-type specificities of differentially expressed genes

Abstract: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is widely used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and reveal biological mechanisms underlying complex biological processes. RNA-seq is often performed on heterogeneous samples and the resulting DEGs do not necessarily indicate the cell-types where the differential expression occurred. While single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) methods solve this problem, technical and cost constraints currently limit its widespread use. Here we present single cell Mapper (scMappR), a method t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next investigated the source of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of cancers and the functionality of exosomal RNAs for cancer diagnosis. Initially, we used a single-cell mapper (scMappR) ( 7 ) to identify the cell type traced for differentiating cancer and control based on both exosomal RNAs and scRNA-seq datasets. We then assigned cell types contributed by the DEGs and determined the cell types with the highest cell-weighted fold (cwFold) change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next investigated the source of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of cancers and the functionality of exosomal RNAs for cancer diagnosis. Initially, we used a single-cell mapper (scMappR) ( 7 ) to identify the cell type traced for differentiating cancer and control based on both exosomal RNAs and scRNA-seq datasets. We then assigned cell types contributed by the DEGs and determined the cell types with the highest cell-weighted fold (cwFold) change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 25 clusters within group 1, 16 clusters within group 2, and 21 clusters within group 3. On each of these clusters, we ran a motif enrichment (Aibar et al 2017) and GO enrichment analysis, and we made use of publicly available single-cell RNA-seq data of the female head to predict in which cell types these expression changes might occur (Sokolowski et al 2021; Li et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We normalized and scaled the data and used the FindMarkers function to compare each of the annotated cell types with all other cell types in the dataset. The resulting marker genes, log 2 fold changes and p-values were used to create a signature matrix for the R package scMappR (Sokolowski et al 2021). scMappR uses this signature matrix to estimate cell type proportions in bulk RNA-seq data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent developments in transcriptomics enable analysis at the single-cell or single-nucleus level to identify and characterize cell types, these techniques have a low gene detection per cell and a high cost, resulting in limited sensitivity to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at low expression levels ( Conesa et al, 2016 ; Wang et al, 2019 ). Therefore, an integrative approach leveraging the cell-level resolution of single-nucleus (sn)RNAseq with the sensitivity of bulk RNAseq has proven to be instrumental for gaining detailed insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in specific cell types ( Barwinska et al, 2021 ; Sokolowski et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%