2020
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-020-00397-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single channel Josephson effect in a high transmission atomic contact

Abstract: The Josephson effect in scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) is an excellent tool to probe the properties of a superconductor on a local scale. We use atomic manipulation in a low temperature STM to create mesoscopic single channel contacts and study the Josephson effect at arbitrary transmissions. We observe significant deviations from the Ambegaokar-Baratoff formula relating the critical current to the order parameter starting from transmissions of τ > 0.1. Using the full current-phase relation, we model the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By extracting the values of I C,NW and I C,C , the dependence of the critical currents on temperature is plotted in Figure 3 b. The red dashed–dotted and gray dotted curves are fits of the temperature dependences of I C,NW and I C,C , respectively, by using the Ambegaokar–Baratoff relation: 40 42 where is the superconducting gap at temperature T , 43 45 R n is the normal-state resistance, and k B is Boltzmann constant. The temperature dependences of both I C,NW and I C,C are fitted using the coefficient a = 2 and 2.4 and R n = 130 and 143 Ω, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By extracting the values of I C,NW and I C,C , the dependence of the critical currents on temperature is plotted in Figure 3 b. The red dashed–dotted and gray dotted curves are fits of the temperature dependences of I C,NW and I C,C , respectively, by using the Ambegaokar–Baratoff relation: 40 42 where is the superconducting gap at temperature T , 43 45 R n is the normal-state resistance, and k B is Boltzmann constant. The temperature dependences of both I C,NW and I C,C are fitted using the coefficient a = 2 and 2.4 and R n = 130 and 143 Ω, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…YSR states have been observed on a variety of magnetic atoms -intrinsically present or deliberately placed on the surface -on various superconducting substrates using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [11][12][13][14][15]. Due to its capabilities to resolve and manipulate single atoms [7,[16][17][18][19], the STM is ideally suited to realize a tunable coupling between one YSR state at the tip apex and another on the sample surface. Elementary charges tunneling between these two YSR states results in subgap excitations that subsequently relax into the continuum of each superconductor acting as a reservoir.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, large scattering range of I SW and R 0 hides possible ef-fect of charging. For the same reason, it is unclear if the impedance of the environment plays any significant role in these experiments: similar values of I SW could be observed for single JJ in a highly-resistive environment (> 100kΩ as in [36] and our setup), single JJ in a low-impedance environment [38], and chains of SQUIDs frustrated by the magnetic field [31,34].…”
Section: In the Regime E Cmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…( 2). [40] 0.17 7..5 0.05 400 Murani 2020 [14] 0.12 5 0.07 Senkpiel 2020 [38] 0.09 0.012 830 Kuzmin 1991 [41] 0.05 1 0.014 8000…”
Section: In the Regime E Cunclassified