2017
DOI: 10.1177/1687814016686665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-input adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control of the lower extremity exoskeleton based on human–robot interaction

Abstract: This article introduces a human–robot interaction controller toward the lower extremity exoskeleton whose aim is to improve the tracking performance and drive the exoskeleton to shadow the wearer with less interaction force. To acquire the motion intention of the wearer, two subsystems are designed: the first is to infer the wearer is in which phase based on floor reaction force detected by a multi-sensor system installed in the sole, and the second is to infer the motion velocity based on the multi-axis force… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, to improve the control precision and robustness of the system, the discrete sliding mode control law and prior torque are introduced. In [23] , an improved single-input fuzzy sliding mode controller together with an adaptive switching controller is proposed to promote the tracking performance of the system. Because the system is affected by interference, the rejection control [24] is regarded to overcome the active interference and applied it to track the human gait trajectory, in that the extended state observer is designed to estimate the total uncertain disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, to improve the control precision and robustness of the system, the discrete sliding mode control law and prior torque are introduced. In [23] , an improved single-input fuzzy sliding mode controller together with an adaptive switching controller is proposed to promote the tracking performance of the system. Because the system is affected by interference, the rejection control [24] is regarded to overcome the active interference and applied it to track the human gait trajectory, in that the extended state observer is designed to estimate the total uncertain disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device would adjust the gait trajectory online according to the indications from a human-machine interaction force set-up. In [19] a humanrobot interaction controller was introduced for a lower extremity exoskeleton whose aim was to improve tracking performance with the development of a fuzzy SMC that considered system uncertainties. This way the controller was able to drive the exoskeleton to shadow the wearer in the presence of weaker interactive driving forces .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMC has two specific features of disturbance rejection and insensibility to uncertainties by designing the sliding mode surface [11]. Different types of SMC strategies are employed for robotic exoskeletons, such as terminal SMC [12], nonsingular terminal SMC [13] and fuzzy SMC [14]. Nevertheless, the performance of sliding mode control is susceptible to the existence of a chattering phenomenon, which may increase control effort and excite high-frequency oscillation [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%