2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2014.6906587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-loop control and trajectory following of a flapping-wing microrobot

Abstract: Abstract-Inspired by the agility of flying insects and the recent development on an insect-scale aerial vehicle, we propose a single-loop adaptive flight control suite designed with an emphasis on the ability to track dynamic trajectories as a step towards the goal of performing acrobatic maneuvers as observed in real insects. Instead of the conventional approach of having cascaded control loops, the proposed controller directly regulates the commanded torques to stabilize the attitude and lateral position in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheme benefits from ease of implementation, guaranteed convergence, and compatibility with the vehicle’s nonlinear dynamics, compared to alternatives such as L 1 -adaptive control that requires linearized dynamics (Guerreiro et al, 2009; Ioannou et al, 2014) or a neural-based adaptive method that necessitates a training period (Coza et al, 2011; Madani and Benallegue, 2008; Nicol et al, 2011). In this section, we present the derivation of the proposed altitude controller and the trajectory tracking controller, briefly introduced in Chirarattananon et al. (2014c), based on techniques borrowed from the sliding mode control method (Bouabdallah and Siegwart, 2005; Slotine et al, 1991).…”
Section: Single-loop Adaptive Tracking Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scheme benefits from ease of implementation, guaranteed convergence, and compatibility with the vehicle’s nonlinear dynamics, compared to alternatives such as L 1 -adaptive control that requires linearized dynamics (Guerreiro et al, 2009; Ioannou et al, 2014) or a neural-based adaptive method that necessitates a training period (Coza et al, 2011; Madani and Benallegue, 2008; Nicol et al, 2011). In this section, we present the derivation of the proposed altitude controller and the trajectory tracking controller, briefly introduced in Chirarattananon et al. (2014c), based on techniques borrowed from the sliding mode control method (Bouabdallah and Siegwart, 2005; Slotine et al, 1991).…”
Section: Single-loop Adaptive Tracking Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we present one possible implementation of heading control not previously discussed in Chirarattananon et al (2014c). Consider the scenario where we would like the i ^ -axis of the robot to point in the direction of the vector I ^ h defined on the I ^ J ^ plane in the inertial frame.…”
Section: Single-loop Adaptive Tracking Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extensive research has been conducted to the controller design [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], where averaging theory is commonly employed to allow approximation of the time-varying system dynamics with its time-invariant average [27,28]. For flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles (FWMAVs), provided that the flapping frequencies are sufficiently high, a controller can be designed on the linearized averaged system where the aerodynamic forces are averaged over one or several wingbeats [17,19,20,[29][30][31]. In our previous work, a geometric controller with global exponential attractiveness for attitude control is designed to address system nonlinearity [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%