1965
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9163(65)90909-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single mode tuning dip in the modulated power output of gas lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1971
1971

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct observation of nonlinear scattering of electrons by a laser beam has been reported [1], but the probability of reflection appeared much higher than what was predicted by the Kapitza and Dirac formula [2]. Since it is well known that the intensity of a laser beam has a Gaussian distribution [3], it can be shown that energy conservation is preserved if this distribution taken explicitly into account in the calculation.…”
Section: Received 15 December 1966mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Direct observation of nonlinear scattering of electrons by a laser beam has been reported [1], but the probability of reflection appeared much higher than what was predicted by the Kapitza and Dirac formula [2]. Since it is well known that the intensity of a laser beam has a Gaussian distribution [3], it can be shown that energy conservation is preserved if this distribution taken explicitly into account in the calculation.…”
Section: Received 15 December 1966mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For instance, we predicted in the a.c. power output a central tuning dip which reveals the saturation more clearly than the well-known Lamb-dip. The dip we observed previously by applying excitation density modulation [1]. Here we report our observation of the modulation dip in case of resonator Q modulation obtained by reflecting the laser beam back into the resonator by means of an external moving mirror [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…J: In fact, we calculated the theoretical curves for r = = 0.1 by means of the exact expression given by Smith. This magnitude of r was approximately known from our earlier measurements [6,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Thus we write N = N + +AN(t), with AN(t) << N. Using Lamb's differential equation for the amplitude E(t) of the electric field in the laser interferometer dE~dr = ~E -~E 3, and its steady-state solution, Eo2 = a/~, we find for the fluctuating part AE(t) in E [cf. 9,10] dAE/dt + 2otAE = (½v/Q) (Eo/N)AN(t), (1) where we assumed AE(t) << E o. The quantities and ~ respresent the unsaturated net gain and the saturation, respectively, as defined by Lamb [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%