“…These studies unambiguously pointed to the advantages of the engineered morphologies with sharp edges (such as nanostars, nanoprims, and nanorods) and their hierarchical assemblies for providing high electromagnetic (EM) field confinement, leading to enhanced SPCE. − Our earlier studies in this direction contributed to this by reaffirming the structural advantages of nanovoids and nano-cavities for achieving significant plasmon-based enhancements. − These, in turn, have been utilized for ultrasensitive and reliable analytical detection through both vibrational Raman (SERS) and fluorescence (SPCE). − Furthermore, 118-fold SPCE enhancements have been demonstrated by minimizing Ohmic losses using high refraction index dielectrics in conjugation with metal nanostructures . In spite of such significant advancements in both fundamental aspects and the applications thereof, the major challenges in SPCE enhancements using metallic nanostructures have been (i) inevitable Ohmic losses along with radiative damping, ,, (ii) poor chemical stability, especially in real-time applications, ,, and (iii) extensive isotropic photon scattering that compromises the magnitude of SPCE enhancements. − As opposed to the variety of metal, non-metallic, dielectric, two-dimensional, and zero-dimensional substrates that have been investigated for SERS, substrates for SPCE have been primarily restricted to metallic and their composites. ,, Thus, a ubiquitous platform that synergistically couples the plasmonic advantages of metallic nanostructures while simultaneously minimizing the Ohmic and radiative losses is desirable for improving the quality factor and reliability of SPCE, thereby transforming it into a powerful ultrasensitive analytical technique. − Achieving this would provide distinct opportunities for portable and mobile phone-based detection capabilities catering to the internet-of-things. , …”