2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Molecule Blinking Fluorescence Enhancement by Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission-Based Substrates for Single-Molecule Localization Imaging

Abstract: Surface plasmon-coupled emission (SPCE) substrates to enhance the blinking fluorescence of spontaneously blinking fluorophores in single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) were fabricated to reduce the excitation power density requirement and reveal the distribution of fluorophore-labeled proteins on a plasma membrane with nanoscale-level resolution. The systemic investigation of the contribution of local field enhancement, modified quantum yield, and emission coupling yield through glass coverslip substr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, HEtetTFER demonstrated spontaneous switching between the signals of fluorescence‐on and fluorescence‐off, as depicted by TPE fluorescence images (inset in Figure 2a). To estimate the fluorescence intensity and blinking events of HEtetTFER, the TPE fluorescence signals of HEtetTFER were detected at an intensity threshold of Inormaltnormalh=Inormalanormalvnormalg+3Inormalsnormaltnormald ${{I}_{{\rm t}{\rm h}}={I}_{{\rm a}{\rm v}{\rm g}}+3{I}_{{\rm s}{\rm t}{\rm d}}}$ , where Iavg ${{I}_{{\rm a}{\rm v}{\rm g}}}$ and Istd ${{I}_{{\rm s}{\rm t}{\rm d}}}$ are the average and standard deviation of the background intensity, respectively [44] . Signals exceeding the threshold were regarded as indicative of TPE fluorescence of HEtetTFER and were used to obtain the histograms of blinking intensity and determine the number of blinking events (Figures 2b and 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, HEtetTFER demonstrated spontaneous switching between the signals of fluorescence‐on and fluorescence‐off, as depicted by TPE fluorescence images (inset in Figure 2a). To estimate the fluorescence intensity and blinking events of HEtetTFER, the TPE fluorescence signals of HEtetTFER were detected at an intensity threshold of Inormaltnormalh=Inormalanormalvnormalg+3Inormalsnormaltnormald ${{I}_{{\rm t}{\rm h}}={I}_{{\rm a}{\rm v}{\rm g}}+3{I}_{{\rm s}{\rm t}{\rm d}}}$ , where Iavg ${{I}_{{\rm a}{\rm v}{\rm g}}}$ and Istd ${{I}_{{\rm s}{\rm t}{\rm d}}}$ are the average and standard deviation of the background intensity, respectively [44] . Signals exceeding the threshold were regarded as indicative of TPE fluorescence of HEtetTFER and were used to obtain the histograms of blinking intensity and determine the number of blinking events (Figures 2b and 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the fluorescence intensity and blinking events of HEtetTFER, the TPE fluorescence signals of HEtetTFER were detected at an intensity threshold of I th ¼ I avg þ 3I std , where I avg and I std are the average and standard deviation of the background intensity, respectively. [44] Signals exceeding the threshold were regarded as indicative of TPE fluorescence of HEtetTFER and were used to obtain the histograms of blinking intensity and determine the number of blinking events (Figures 2b and 2c). The average TPE fluorescence blinking intensity and the average number of blinking events from a single HEtetTFER fluorophore were 722 a.u.…”
Section: Tpe Blinking Fluorescence Measurement Of Single Fluorophorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies unambiguously pointed to the advantages of the engineered morphologies with sharp edges (such as nanostars, nanoprims, and nanorods) and their hierarchical assemblies for providing high electromagnetic (EM) field confinement, leading to enhanced SPCE. Our earlier studies in this direction contributed to this by reaffirming the structural advantages of nanovoids and nano-cavities for achieving significant plasmon-based enhancements. These, in turn, have been utilized for ultrasensitive and reliable analytical detection through both vibrational Raman (SERS) and fluorescence (SPCE). Furthermore, 118-fold SPCE enhancements have been demonstrated by minimizing Ohmic losses using high refraction index dielectrics in conjugation with metal nanostructures . In spite of such significant advancements in both fundamental aspects and the applications thereof, the major challenges in SPCE enhancements using metallic nanostructures have been (i) inevitable Ohmic losses along with radiative damping, ,, (ii) poor chemical stability, especially in real-time applications, ,, and (iii) extensive isotropic photon scattering that compromises the magnitude of SPCE enhancements. As opposed to the variety of metal, non-metallic, dielectric, two-dimensional, and zero-dimensional substrates that have been investigated for SERS, substrates for SPCE have been primarily restricted to metallic and their composites. ,, Thus, a ubiquitous platform that synergistically couples the plasmonic advantages of metallic nanostructures while simultaneously minimizing the Ohmic and radiative losses is desirable for improving the quality factor and reliability of SPCE, thereby transforming it into a powerful ultrasensitive analytical technique. Achieving this would provide distinct opportunities for portable and mobile phone-based detection capabilities catering to the internet-of-things. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To date, most of the detection methods at the single-molecule level at room temperature rely on the use of molecules with high fluorescence quantum yield combined with efficient spectral rejection of background light. , However, for molecules or materials without fluorescence or with low quantum yield, we cannot use fluorescence microscopy, which strongly limits its application in chemistry and materials science. In addition, fluorescent molecules always suffer other disadvantages, including photobleaching and blinking . To overcome these limitations of fluorescence-based microscopy, many other methods have been developed to detect and image individual nano-objects or molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, fluorescent molecules always suffer other disadvantages, including photobleaching and blinking. 5 To overcome these limitations of fluorescence-based microscopy, many other methods have been developed to detect and image individual nano-objects or molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%