2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-022-01386-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-path ground motion amplifications during the 2020 Haenam, South Korea, swarm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was restricted to drilled stations and epicenters within 120 km, and only light and medium earthquakes (3.0 ≤ M L < 6.0) were considered, with amplitude attenuation trends confirmed. The site effect was not trained, and for estimating IM at a specific site surface, passive methods such as transfer functions or one-dimensional ground response analysis (Kwak et al [49]) should be used.…”
Section: Data Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was restricted to drilled stations and epicenters within 120 km, and only light and medium earthquakes (3.0 ≤ M L < 6.0) were considered, with amplitude attenuation trends confirmed. The site effect was not trained, and for estimating IM at a specific site surface, passive methods such as transfer functions or one-dimensional ground response analysis (Kwak et al [49]) should be used.…”
Section: Data Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) system of the KMA uses the SAC of the Borcherdt model (Borcherdt, 1994). However, the site coefficient is not suitable as a ground surface prediction model for borehole stations, as the within-motion in the rock around the borehole differs from the rock outcrop motion in the free field (Kwak et al, 2022;Lai et al, 2022). Second, the ground response can be interpreted via numerical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ground surface analysis method has been shown to be highly effective in predicting ground surface vibrations (Park and Hashash, 2004). Kwak et al (2022) proposed estimation of the ground surface response by combining the ground motion model (GMM) and 1D site response. However, this required a prior site characterize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%