2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single point iterative weighted fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm for remote sensing image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed ColorRcP clustering algorithm is evaluated here, and its performance has been compared with the following FCM-based segmentation methods: the Hidden Markov random field FCM (HMRFFCM) [9], the histogram thresholding FCM (HTFCM) [10], the fuzzy hyper-prototype clustering (FHCS) [11], the quantized FCM (QFCM_S2) [12], the usual-initialization FCM (UFCM) [13], the color-clustering FCM (CFCM) [14], and the single point iterative weighted FCM (SWFCM) [15]. We also compare our proposal with other image segmentation techniques beyond FCM such as the penalized inverse expectation maximization (PIEM) which extracts the features for each pixel using the Gabor filter, and the classification of pixels in different regions is done by the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm [25] and the segmentation by clustering then labeling (SCLpost) which uses small homogeneous regions to adopt a 3D feature vector obtained through the color space, and then, the clustering is done by a hybrid approach that combines the mean-shift with a semisupervised discriminant analysis algorithm [26].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed ColorRcP clustering algorithm is evaluated here, and its performance has been compared with the following FCM-based segmentation methods: the Hidden Markov random field FCM (HMRFFCM) [9], the histogram thresholding FCM (HTFCM) [10], the fuzzy hyper-prototype clustering (FHCS) [11], the quantized FCM (QFCM_S2) [12], the usual-initialization FCM (UFCM) [13], the color-clustering FCM (CFCM) [14], and the single point iterative weighted FCM (SWFCM) [15]. We also compare our proposal with other image segmentation techniques beyond FCM such as the penalized inverse expectation maximization (PIEM) which extracts the features for each pixel using the Gabor filter, and the classification of pixels in different regions is done by the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm [25] and the segmentation by clustering then labeling (SCLpost) which uses small homogeneous regions to adopt a 3D feature vector obtained through the color space, and then, the clustering is done by a hybrid approach that combines the mean-shift with a semisupervised discriminant analysis algorithm [26].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in the images, the ColorRcP To demonstrate the performance of the proposed ColorRcP clustering scheme in real applications, a subregion from the remote sensing image 'Zhalong Nature Reserve' (see Figure 6a) is segmented [15]. The proposed algorithm is compared with other approaches designed to segment this kind of images, such as the UFCM, CFCM, and SWFCM algorithms [13][14][15].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modified FCM algorithm [7] mentioned above has been successfully applied on remote sensing images as well as synthetic images. In [27], a remote sensing image segmentation procedure that utilizes a single point iterative weighted fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithm is proposed based on the prior information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most significant advantages of fuzzy K-means is that it more naturally handles situations in which subclasses are formed by mixing (or interpolating) extreme examples. Fuzzy K-means has been widely used in remote sensing, and many algorithms are derived from it [20]- [25]. However, these foregoing algorithms have similar drawbacks when used in remote-sensing imagery analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%