DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-9625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-session psychotherapy for depression: is it better to focus on problems or solutions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believed that SFBT could be a beneficial therapeutic option for depressed prelocutive deaf persons for several reasons. As mentioned previously, SFBT has shown promising results in the treatment of depression (Linssen, 2003;Knekt & Lindfors, 2004;Lee, Greene, Mentzer, Pinnell, & Niles, 2001;Sundstrom, 1993). It is a brief treatment that is simple and teachable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believed that SFBT could be a beneficial therapeutic option for depressed prelocutive deaf persons for several reasons. As mentioned previously, SFBT has shown promising results in the treatment of depression (Linssen, 2003;Knekt & Lindfors, 2004;Lee, Greene, Mentzer, Pinnell, & Niles, 2001;Sundstrom, 1993). It is a brief treatment that is simple and teachable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The first to utilize a randomized experimental design was the Sundstrom (1993) study, which compared a single session of SFBT with a single session of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression in the treatment of 40 depressed female college students. No significant differences between the two treatments were found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research on SFBT has been completed testing clients’ level of depression pre‐ and posttreatment. Sundstrom (1993) conducted an experimental research study testing to see if SFBT faired better than Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression (IPT) for the treatment of depression. Results from this study found that clients in both groups did significantly better after treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a rigorous process of selection, Gingerich and Eisengart identified 15 controlled studies of SFBT and further divided these papers into three groups based upon a set of criteria as to the adequacy of controls employed. Gingerich & Eisengart (2000) identified five well‐controlled studies; these were in the areas of depression in college students (Sundstrom 1994), parenting skills (Zimmerman et al . 1996), rehabilitation of orthopaedic patients (Cockburn et al .…”
Section: General Overview Of Sfbt Theory and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%