2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.125310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Si dopants in GaAs studied by scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy

Abstract: We present a comprehensive scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy study of individual Si dopants in GaAs. We explain all the spectroscopic peaks and their voltage dependence in the band gap and in the conduction band. We observe both the filled and empty donor state. Donors close to the surface, which have an enhanced binding energy, show a second ionization ring, corresponding to the negatively charged donor D − . The observation of all predicted features at the expected spectral position and with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(57 reference statements)
2
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias dependence of the energy level of the localized acceptor state E A is described by the lever arm α = e −1 dE A /dV . 18,19 Here we present a direct measurement of the lever arm and measure the shift E = −αe(V onset − V FB ) by studying transport through individual subsurface acceptors where we directly determine: (i) the potential due to the negatively charged nucleus, (ii) the flat-band voltage and depth of the acceptors from direct tunneling to/from the conductance/valence band, and (iii) the ionization voltage and lever arm from single-electron transport through the localized acceptor state. 23 The relevant parameters chosen for these calculations to match the change in band gap are the tip-sample separation 0.8 nm, the tip radius 8 nm, and the doping concentration 1 × 10 18 cm −3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bias dependence of the energy level of the localized acceptor state E A is described by the lever arm α = e −1 dE A /dV . 18,19 Here we present a direct measurement of the lever arm and measure the shift E = −αe(V onset − V FB ) by studying transport through individual subsurface acceptors where we directly determine: (i) the potential due to the negatively charged nucleus, (ii) the flat-band voltage and depth of the acceptors from direct tunneling to/from the conductance/valence band, and (iii) the ionization voltage and lever arm from single-electron transport through the localized acceptor state. 23 The relevant parameters chosen for these calculations to match the change in band gap are the tip-sample separation 0.8 nm, the tip radius 8 nm, and the doping concentration 1 × 10 18 cm −3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(a)]. Rather than trying to estimate the lever arm by solving the Poisson equation, 13,19,23,26 we fit the differential conductance peaks to a thermally broadened Lorentzian line shape 32 [shown in Fig. 4(b)]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a monoatomic step on the (110) surface the atomic corrugation would be shifted by half a lattice constant. In addition, the sharp jagged edges of the dark objects point against charging effects as seen at donors or acceptors [32]. Accordingly, these highly localized dark objects must be attributed to In-poor (i.e., Al-rich) spots in the AlInAs layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the contact potential, which is maximal below the tip, be compensated. The voltage |V| for ionization therefore is largest for a donor below the tip apex 27 . The variation of the donor levels D 0 and D þ and the vibrational excitations with lateral position reflects the TIBB in the semiconductor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%