2016
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2015.2468588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Trial ERP Component Analysis Using a Spatiotemporal LCMV Beamformer

Abstract: Eliminating averaging allows us to test more detailed hypotheses and apply more powerful statistical models. For example, it allows the usage of multilevel regression models that can incorporate between subject/stimulus variation as random effects, test multiple effects simultaneously, and control confounding effects by partial regression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference (albeit in the short time-range only) could be attributed to the slight (statistically not significant) difference in forward association strength (FAS) between the two stimulus groups (note, that this difference was common to both experimental versions). The absence of inhibition in the long experimental version, where subjects were not aware of their L2 manipulation that could have demoted the processing of the homograph-related group, resulted in a difference between the homograph-related and control-related groups with a smaller N400 amplitude in response to homograph-related group (though for a short time only), which is also observed in other monolingual studies with semantic priming [65]. On the other hand, in the short experimental version, where subjects were aware about their L2 manipulation this difference was absent, probably due to an active inhibition of L2, which was also observed to influence the homograph-related group rendering its processing more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This difference (albeit in the short time-range only) could be attributed to the slight (statistically not significant) difference in forward association strength (FAS) between the two stimulus groups (note, that this difference was common to both experimental versions). The absence of inhibition in the long experimental version, where subjects were not aware of their L2 manipulation that could have demoted the processing of the homograph-related group, resulted in a difference between the homograph-related and control-related groups with a smaller N400 amplitude in response to homograph-related group (though for a short time only), which is also observed in other monolingual studies with semantic priming [65]. On the other hand, in the short experimental version, where subjects were aware about their L2 manipulation this difference was absent, probably due to an active inhibition of L2, which was also observed to influence the homograph-related group rendering its processing more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…How large these differences need to be in order for clusters to be differentiated depends on the SNR that can be achieved in estimating the amplitudes. In this study, we employed a spatiotemporal LCMV beamformer, which has been shown to produce more reliable estimates of the N400 amplitude than more traditional approaches, such as measuring the mean voltage in a fixed time window (van Vliet et al, 2016).…”
Section: Considerations Regarding the Interpretation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this summation represents the estimated amplitude of the N400 component of the ERP within that epoch. For an in-depth explanation and implementation details of the method, see van Vliet et al (2016).…”
Section: Beamformer Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations