Single unit activity in the peripheral lateral line system of the cichlid fishSarotherodon niloticus L.

Abstract

The activities of single afferent fibers were recorded in the trunk lateral line nerve of the cichlid fish Sarotherodon niloticus L. Using both electrophysiological recordings and neuroanatomical tracing techniques, the number, arrangement, and innervation of superficial (SNs) and canal (CNs) neuromasts were determined. Both, SNs and CNs, are innervated by several afferent fibers of different diameters and efferent fibers. The CNs and SNs are neuronally separated: afferent fibers which innervate both CNs and SNs were not found. Whereas the single CN is innervated by a separate set of afferent fibers, fibers innervating the SNs within rows often branched to reach all or several SNs. The SNs within a row were thus considered to form a functional unit. With the exception of SNs on the tail fin, functional units of neuromasts were in general topographically restricted to single scales.The majority of lateral line units had resting activity. On the basis of the time interval distribution of the resting activity, 4 types of units were classified: these were labelled irregular (type I), regular (type II), bimodal (type III) and silent (type IV). Type I was the most common type of resting activity (obtained in 47.8% of the recorded units). Units with this resting activity type were identified as afferents innervating either SNs or CNs. Units with resting activity of type II represented mostly afferents of CNs if their mean activity was high (around 40 imp/s). If the mean activity of this type was below 20 imp/s the units were unresponsive to local water movements and at least some were identified as efferent fibers. Resting activity of type III was found only in units originating from CNs. Only 4% of the units were silent (type IV). These units were often identified as injured neuromasts.Abbreviations." SN superficial neuromast; CN canal neuromast Units originating from CNs show higher mean resting activity than those from SNs. For both SN and CN units, the mean discharge rate of the resting activity correlated with the sensitivity to stimulation for sinusoidal water movements.During stimulation of the neuromasts by sinusoidal water movements of small amplitude and different frequencies, the response characteristics of SN and CN units were determined by linear frequency analysis under steady state conditions. Most units responded linearly to small stimulus amplitudes. In this amplitude range the units' resting activity was modulated according to the stimulus frequency. Small stimulus amplitudes proportionally changed the amount of modulation but did not alter the phase of the response. CN and SN units that responded linearly produce differing frequency responses. Whereas CNs were most sensitive at frequencies of up to 200 Hz (center frequencies between 100 and 200 Hz), the center frequencies of SNs were distributed between 10 and 70 Hz with a maximum number at about 30 Hz. Bode plots for many CN and SN units indicated that the neuromasts were sensitive to the acceleration component of the water movement.The functional si...

Test of the mechanotactile hypothesis: neuromast morphology and response dynamics of mechanosensory lateral line primary afferents in the stingray

“…These preliminary experiments confirmed that the neural responses are linear relative to stimulus amplitude, as found in other lateral line systems (e.g. Kroese et al, 1978;Münz, 1985;see Results below).…”

Anterior lateral line nerve encoding to tones and play back vocalisations in free swimming oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau

“…Although silent fibres that previously have been isolated in the toadfish lateral line were not isolated here (Palmer et al, 2005), several fibres of relatively low frequency were characterised and found to have phasic properties. These types of fibres have also been reported in a closely related toadfish, the midshipman (Weeg and Bass, 2002), and in other teleosts (Coombs and Janssen, 1990;Kroese and Schellart, 1992;Montgomery et al, 1988;Munz, 1985;Wubbels et al, 1990).…”

Performance analysis for lateral-line-inspired sensor arrays

“…Each neuromast on the surface is not innervated individually, but a group of 5 to 10 are innervated jointly [14,59]. This implies that the flow velocity information is effectively averaged over a small region on the fish surface before any further processing.…”

“…In contrast to the superficial neuromasts, each individual canal neuromast is independently innervated [59]. This emphasis on the importance of each individual canal neuromast is also evident in the shape of the canals, which are frequently irregularly shaped in order to magnify the fluid velocity at the location of the neuromasts [28] (see lower left cephalic canal system in Figure 2-2 for example).…”