2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.00366
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular boundary behaviour and large solutions for fractional elliptic equations

Abstract: We show that the boundary behaviour of solutions to nonlocal fractional equations posed in bounded domains strongly differs from the one of solutions to elliptic problems modelled upon the Laplace-Poisson equation with zero boundary data. In this classical case it is known that, at least in a suitable weak sense, solutions of non-homogeneous Dirichlet problem are unique and tend to zero at the boundary. Limits of these solutions then produce solutions of some non-homogeneous Dirichlet problem as the interior d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Optimal boundary behavior: To prove this, we study the action of the Green's operator on the inverse of the distance function perturbed with logarithmic nonlinearity. Using the lower and upper bound estimates of the Green's kernel [26] and borrowing some techniques from [2], we show…”
Section: Description Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Optimal boundary behavior: To prove this, we study the action of the Green's operator on the inverse of the distance function perturbed with logarithmic nonlinearity. Using the lower and upper bound estimates of the Green's kernel [26] and borrowing some techniques from [2], we show…”
Section: Description Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the Censored (or Regional) Fractional Laplacian (CFL), 2s− γ − 1 = 0 and this is a Dirichlet type condition. As mentioned in [4], no examples are known to satisfy 2s−γ −1 > 0. In this last setting, Eu = 0 seems to be a redundant condition u = 0 in ∂Ω, which calls into question if the Green operator G, introduced in (2.1), comes from a reasonable direct operator L. Nevertheless, as in [4] we will include a mathematical framework for these problems.…”
Section: General Evolution Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-posed problem follows in that case. Two questions immediately arise from the elliptic studies, in particular [4]: whether this singular behaviour is preserved in the parabolic problem, and what is the corresponding theory. We will try to give a satisfactory answer to those questions in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) For all (t, x, y) ∈ [1, ∞) × D × D, q(t, x, y) ≃ e −tλ β 1 δ D (x) α/2 δ D (y) α/2 , where λ 1 is the smallest eigenvalue of the Dirichlet (fractional) Laplacian (−∆) α/2 D . From Theorem 1.1 (1), one can see that, for x, y away from the boundary (in the sense that δ ∧ (x, y) ≥ |x − y| ∨ t 1/(αβ) ), and for all β ∈ (0, 1), it holds that q(t, x, y) ≃ t −d/(αβ) ∧ t |x − y| d+αβ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1,1 open set in R d and α ∈ (0, 2). Let Y D be the part process in D of an isotropic α-stable process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%