2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2006.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular boundary elements for three-dimensional elasticity problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the comparison is in integrated values of the computed potential, and not in the potential itself. Both solutions includes representation errors; the analytic solution is given in series form, in which the singular behavior in corner is not included (Guzina et al, 2006). In contrast, the BEM solution is obtained with constant elements, and the radiation boundary condition is imposed in an approximate form.…”
Section: Added Mass Of a Floating Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the comparison is in integrated values of the computed potential, and not in the potential itself. Both solutions includes representation errors; the analytic solution is given in series form, in which the singular behavior in corner is not included (Guzina et al, 2006). In contrast, the BEM solution is obtained with constant elements, and the radiation boundary condition is imposed in an approximate form.…”
Section: Added Mass Of a Floating Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quadrilateral elements, the node shift is presented with a similar definition as triangular elements shown in Fig. 15, Mi and Aliabadi [1994] chose the node shift as 1/2 and the error less 4%, Subia et al [1995] considered that the node shift equals to 1/3 is the best but between 1/20 and 3/5 is relatively constant for the results, Guzina et al [2006] regarded the node shift in the range 1/20-1/4 is optimal. In view of the above node shift selection, we select node shift as 1/20, 1/10, 1/6, 1/4, 1/3, 1/2 and 3/5, and compare the stress results at Z-direction (traction adding direction) with analytical solution.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its versatility and rigor in treating threedimensional interior as well as exterior domain problems, the advanced computational BEM platform by Pak and Guzina [14] is employed in this treatment. It features a regularized boundary integral equation formulation, a library of fundamental solutions including a set of multi-layered elastic and visco-elastic dynamic half-space displacement and traction Green's functionsÛ andT [34,44] with a bi-material decomposition at layer interfaces [45], a set of singular and adaptivegradient (AG) elements for mixed boundary value problems [46,47], as well as a nested adaptive integration scheme for robustness and accuracy. To implement the proposed half-space decomposition, the homogenized finite zone I contiguous to the foundation is taken as an interior domain for which the use of the dynamic Kelvin solution is appropriate.…”
Section: Computational Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%