2019
DOI: 10.2298/tam181215001f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singularities of integrable Liouville systems, reduction of integrals to lower degree and topological billiards: Recent results

Abstract: In the paper we present the new results in the theory of integrable Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom and topological billiards. The results are obtained by the authors, their students, and participants of scientific seminars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since each PRL is a rectangle which includes in its interior a point which is a local minimizer of V(by lemma 4.6), and since for exterior GWS all local minimizers are not in the billiard domain, we conclude that each PRL which includes a point inside the billiard domain must also include a minimizer of V which is not in the billiard domain, so it must intersect the wall, namely the leaf is an impact leaf as claimed. Since, by lemma 4.4 and equation (17), for H < H tmin min all the iso-energy leaves do not intersect the wall, by the above argument they all must lie outside of the billiard domain so no motion is allowed for H < H tmin min . Lemma 4.8 (Claim 2 of proposition 4.1).…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 41mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since each PRL is a rectangle which includes in its interior a point which is a local minimizer of V(by lemma 4.6), and since for exterior GWS all local minimizers are not in the billiard domain, we conclude that each PRL which includes a point inside the billiard domain must also include a minimizer of V which is not in the billiard domain, so it must intersect the wall, namely the leaf is an impact leaf as claimed. Since, by lemma 4.4 and equation (17), for H < H tmin min all the iso-energy leaves do not intersect the wall, by the above argument they all must lie outside of the billiard domain so no motion is allowed for H < H tmin min . Lemma 4.8 (Claim 2 of proposition 4.1).…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 41mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Proof. Since, by lemma 4.4 and equation (17), for H < H tmin min all the iso-energy leaves do not intersect the wall, the leaves in the allowed region of motion belong to the non-impact zone. We need to check when some of these non-impacting leaves are in the allowed region of motion.…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations