SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DÜŞÜNME STİLLERİ v

Özbaş, Nurseval; Sağır, Şafak Uluçınar

doi:10.7822/egt198

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Because this is a very important step for individuals to be satisfied with the job they have in their lives and to be successful, and hence, to lead a happy life. In the researches conducted in the literature, it is possible to encounter many studies that investigate the thinking styles and decision-making styles separately (Eldeleklioğlu, 1999;Cano-Garcia and Hughes, 2000;Güçray, 2001;Taşdelen, 2001;Deniz, 2002;Köksal, 2003;Sünbül, 2004;Akboy, Argun, İkiz, 2005;Buluş, 2005;Sağır, 2006;Avşaroğlu, 2007;Palut, 2008;Tufan, Coşkun, 2009;Ün, 2010;Aydın-Orhan, 2011;Demir, Erginsoy-Osmanoğlu, 2013;Emir, 2013;Özbaş, Uluçınar-Sağır, 2014;Aktaş, 2016;Çelik, 2016). However, the number of studies examining the correlation between thinking styles and decision-making styles (Vural, 2013;Öztabak, 2013) is limited.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Çünkü bu durum bireylerin yaşamlarında yaptıkları işten memnun olmaları ve başarılı olmaları, dolayısıyla mutlu bir yaşam sürebilmeleri için oldukça önemli bir adımdır. Literatürde yapılan çalışmalarda düşünme stilleri ve karar verme stillerini ayrı ayrı inceleyen çok sayıda çalışmayla karşılaşmak mümkündür (Eldeleklioğlu, 1999;Cano-Garcia ve Hughes, 2000;Güçray, 2001;Taşdelen, 2001;Deniz, 2002;Köksal, 2003;Sünbül, 2004;Akboy vd., 2005;Buluş, 2005;Sağır, 2006;Avşaroğlu, 2007;Palut, 2008;Tufan, Coşkun, 2009;Ün, 2010;Aydın-Orhan, 2011;Demir ve Erginsoy-Osmanoğlu, 2013;Emir, 2013;Özbaş, Uluçınar-Sağır, 2014;Aktaş, 2016;Çelik, 2016). Bununla birlikte düşünme stilleri ve karar verme stilleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelendiği çalışma sayısı (Vural, 2013;Öztabak, 2013) oldukça azdır.…”

Section: Gġrġġunclassified

“…Vural (2013) spor yöneticileriyle yaptığı çalışmasında, cinsiyetler açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığını belirlemiştir. Özbaş ve Uluçınar- Sağır (2014) sınıf öğretmenlerinin düşünme stillerini inceledikleri çalışmalarında cinsiyetler arasında düşünme stillerinin alt boyutlarından monarşik, ayrıntıcı ve tutucu stillerde erkeklerin kadınlara oranla anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek puanlar aldıklarını belirlemişlerdir. Çelik (2015), cinsiyete göre düşünme stillerini incelendiğinde yasamacı, yürütmeci, hiyerarşik ve içedönük düşünme stillerinde kızların erkeklere oranla anlamlı düzeyde yüksek puanlar aldıklarını belirlemiştir.…”

Section: Sonuç Ve Tartiġmaunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Investigation of the Successful People's Thinking Styles and Decision-Making Styles in Different Career Groups in Terms of Different Variables

Gümüşer¹,

Uysal²,

Ayverdi³

2020

Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışma 3. yazar danışmanlığında 1. ve 2. yazarlar tarafından TÜBİTAK Liselerarası Proje Yarışması'nda sunulmuş ve derece almıştır. ÖzÇalışmanın amacı, farklı mesleklerde başarılı kişilerin düşünme stilleri ile karar verme stilleri arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymak ve düşünme stilleri ile karar verme stillerini cinsiyet ve meslek grubu değişkenleri açısından incelemektir. Araştırma ilişkisel tarama modelinde yürütülmüş olup; çalışma grubu, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden kartopu örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 184 kişiden oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Sternberg-Wagner Düşünme Stilleri Ölçeği (SWDSÖ) ve Melbourne Karar Verme Ölçeği I-II (MKVÖ I-II) kullanılmıştır. Veriler, SPSS 22 programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, farklı mesleklerde başarılı kişilerin düşünme stilleri ve karar verme stilleri arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Mesleğinde başarılı kişilerin düşünme ve karar verme stillerinde, cinsiyet açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı sonuçlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Farklı mesleklerde başarılı kişilerin düşünme stillerinde meslek grubuna göre anlamlı farklar olduğu belirlenmiştir.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gġrġġunclassified

Section: Sonuç Ve Tartiġmaunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Investigation of the Successful People's Thinking Styles and Decision-Making Styles in Different Career Groups in Terms of Different Variables

Gümüşer¹,

Uysal²,

Ayverdi³

2020

Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Relationship between Thinking Styles and the Need for Cognition of Students in the Faculty of Education

Sağlam¹,

Tunç²

2018

IES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to identify the relationship between thinking styles and the need for cognition in students of the faculty of education, as well as the existence of significant differences between these two variables according to gender, department of study, class level, educational background from secondary school level, monthly incomes of families and the place where families have resided longest. The study was conducted with 820 students studying at different departments of the Faculty of Education at Gaziantep University, during the 2014-2015 academic year. In the study, data was collected using the Thinking Styles Scale and the Need for Cognition Scale, while demographic details of students were obtained through a Personal Information Form created by the researcher. Pearson’s correlation test, t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed in SPSS 20 software for data analysis. According to the findings of the study, students of the education faculty use the legislative thinking style the most and the conservative thinking style the least among the others given in the Thinking Styles Scale. According to the findings regarding the relationship between thinking styles and the need for cognition; the Thinking Styles Scale shows that there are significant differences between the legislative, executive, judicial, hierarchic, oligarchic, anarchic, local, internal, liberal dimensions of thinking and the need for cognition, while there is no significant difference between the global and conservative thinking styles and the need for cognition. It is seen that legislative, executive and hierarchic dimensions of the Thinking Styles Scale differ significantly according to the gender variable. Local, conservative and oligarchic dimensions of the Thinking Style Scale also show significant differences according to the department where the students study. This differentiation is seen in favor of the classroom teaching department against the Psychological Counselling and Guidance (PCG) students in the local thinking style dimension, while it is more favorable for the mathematics teaching department against the PCG students in both conservative and oligarchic dimensions. It is also seen that the legislative and local dimensions of the Thinking Styles Scale differ significantly according to the monthly incomes of families. This differentiation is in favor of the 2000 TL and above income group in each of these thinking styles, against those with monthly incomes between 500-1000 TL. On the other hand, the place where families have resided the longest, which is often the same place where students have completed their secondary education, do not differ significantly according to class levels. The Need for Cognition Scale scores differ significantly in favor of the 4th grade students according to the class level variable. A similar significant differentiation in the Need for Cognition Scale scores is also seen in favor of urban areas (provinces) against rural areas (villages) according to the place where families have resided the longest. Finally, the Need for Cognition Scale scores do not show any significant difference in terms of the departments students study at, their secondary school majors and monthly incomes of families.

show abstract

SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DÜŞÜNME STİLLERİ v

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Investigation of the Successful People's Thinking Styles and Decision-Making Styles in Different Career Groups in Terms of Different Variables

Investigation of the Successful People's Thinking Styles and Decision-Making Styles in Different Career Groups in Terms of Different Variables

The Relationship between Thinking Styles and the Need for Cognition of Students in the Faculty of Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About