2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04.
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2004.1421364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SINR, bit error rate, and shannon capacity optimized spread-spectrum steganography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, N , can be steered away from the embedding carrier using an operator of the form (I L − css T ) with a parameter c ∈ R and the carrier s ∈ R L . In parallel to (2), the composite signal of additive SS embedding on linearly transformed host data is [11,12,22] …”
Section: Ss Embedding On Linearly Transformed Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…, N , can be steered away from the embedding carrier using an operator of the form (I L − css T ) with a parameter c ∈ R and the carrier s ∈ R L . In parallel to (2), the composite signal of additive SS embedding on linearly transformed host data is [11,12,22] …”
Section: Ss Embedding On Linearly Transformed Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 2 Consider additive SS embedding in linearly transformed host data by (11), and secret message is recovered by matched filter. For any hidden messageinduced distortion budget D and any carrier s, the optimal amplitude A and transformation parameter c to maximize the SINR of matched filter are…”
Section: Ss Embedding On Linearly Transformed Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations