Sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: a systematic review of clinical data

Ekhlasmandkermani, Mehdi; Amid, Reza; Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi; Hajizadeh, Farhad; Abed, Pooria Fallah; Kheiri, Lida; Kheiri, Aida

doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.6.411

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study, the implants were placed immediately after socket lifting in Grade B and C, and the outcomes were favorable without complications. High success of simultaneous immediate implant following socket lifting was reported in a previous study, in agreement with our findings 43 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

Guidance and rationale for the immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar

Mustakim

Lee

et al. 2023

JKAOMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: While the reliability of immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar has been discussed, its significance is questionable. There have been no guidelines for case selection and surgical technique for successful treatment outcomes of immediate maxillary molar implants. Therefore, in this study, we classified alveolar bone height and socket morphology of the maxillary molar to establish guidelines for immediate implant placement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

Guidance and rationale for the immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar

Mustakim

Lee

et al. 2023

JKAOMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sinus floor elevation through a lateral access is a well-documented procedure used to increase bone volume in the posterior segments of the maxilla [ 1 ]. This approach includes the elevation of the sinus mucosa and the immediate placement of biomaterial [ 2 , 3 ], devices [ 4 , 5 , 6 ], implants alone [ 7 , 8 ], or in conjunction with biomaterial [ 9 ], aiming to maintain over time the elevated volume and allow bone growth within the subantral space [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. The use of a membrane to cover the lateral bone window has been suggested to improve implant success [ 1 ] and might decrease both the dislodgment of the biomaterial through the access window [ 15 , 16 ] and the post-surgical morbidity [ 16 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osseointegration at Implants Installed in Composite Bone: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Sinus Floor Elevation

Kotsu¹,

Alccayhuaman

Ferri³

et al. 2022

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Osseointegration of implants installed in conjunction with sinus floor elevation might be affected by the presence of residual graft. The implant surface characteristics and the protection of the access window using a collagen membrane might influence the osseointegration. To evaluate these factors, sinus floor elevation was performed in patients using a natural bovine bone grafting material. The access windows were either covered with a collagen membrane made of porcine corium (Mb group) or left uncovered (No-Mb group) and, after six months, two mini-implants with either a moderate rough or turned surfaces were installed. After 3 months, biopsies containing the mini-implants were retrieved, processed histologically, and analyzed. Twenty patients, ten in each group, were included in the study. The two mini-implants were retrieved from fourteen patients, six belonging to the Mb group, and eight to the No-Mb group. No statistically significant differences were found in osseointegration between groups. However, statistically significant differences were found between the two surfaces. It was concluded that implants with a moderately rough surface installed in a composite bone presented much higher osseointegration compared to those with a turned surface. The present study failed to show an effect of the use of a collagen membrane on the access window.

show abstract

“…Attempting to reduce the number of surgical interventions, implant placement simultaneous with sinus lifting [1][2][3] and tooth extractions [4,5] has been advocated. Both procedures are considered being technically sensitive requiring experience from the implant surgeon [4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanical Performance of a Novel Implant Design in Simulated Extraction Sites and Sinuslift Procedures

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With increasing experience and in an attempt to shorten overall treatment times, implant placement in combination with tooth extractions and sinus lift procedures has become popular. In both cases, primary stability has to be achieved by either engaging apical and oral regions of trabecular bone or by engaging residual host bone beneath the sinus cavity. Extraction sites were formed by pressing a root analog into homogeneous low density polyurethane foam which was used as bone surrogate while a 3 mm thick sheet of medium density foam was used for mimicking a sinus lift situation. Two types (n = 10) of bone level implants with a conventional tapered design and a cervical back taper (NobelActive; control) and a novel design characterized by a shift in core diameter and thread geometry (AlfaGate; test) were placed in these models following conventional osteotomy preparation. Insertion torque was measured using a surgical motor and primary stability was determined by resonance frequency analysis. Statistical analysis was based on Welch two sample t tests with the level of significance set at α = 0.05. In sinuslifting, NobelActive implants required significantly higher insertion torques as compared to AlfaGate (p = 0.000) but did not achieve greater implant stability (p = 0.076). In extraction sites, AlfaGate implants showed both, significantly higher insertion torques (p = 0.004) and significantly greater implant stability (p = 0.000). The novel implant design allowed for greater primary stability when being placed in simulated extraction sockets and sinuslift situations. While in extraction sockets the position of condensing threads in combination with an increase in core diameter is beneficial, the deep cervical threads of the novel implant lead to superior performance in sinuslift situations.

show abstract

Sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: a systematic review of clinical data

Cited by 6 publications

References 44 publications

Guidance and rationale for the immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar

Guidance and rationale for the immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar

Osseointegration at Implants Installed in Composite Bone: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Sinus Floor Elevation

Biomechanical Performance of a Novel Implant Design in Simulated Extraction Sites and Sinuslift Procedures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About