Performance assessment at shipyard companies only includes price criteria, product quality, and ownership of SKT as a registered supplier in the company. This performance assessment is considered not optimal so that there are problems caused by suppliers every year by different suppliers. Based on these problems, this research was conducted to determine the criteria and sub-criteria that have a major influence on supplier performance assessment by using metrics in the SCOR Model but also taking into account the company's needs and then assessing supplier performance based on predetermined criteria and sub-criteria. The weighting of the performance assessment criteria and sub-criteria is carried out by the AHP method and the supplier performance assessment is carried out by the TOPSIS method. The results obtained by the AHP method are that the quality criteria get the largest weight, namely 0.401, cost (0.288), reliability (0.215), responsiveness (0.215) and agility (0.107). The results of the sub-criteria weighting get the subcriteria with the highest weight, namely price stability (0.381), delivery performance to commit date (0.412), responsiveness to complaints (0.750), upside source adaptability (0.425), quality of product (0.835). Based on the results of the consumable supplier performance assessment, the top 5 suppliers were obtained with supplier codes SEJA21CS, ACR23CS, IMP25CS, AFM12CS, KPRI20CS. Based on the results of the performance evaluation, it was found that there were 2 suppliers with very good assessment results, 7 suppliers with good assessment results, 10 suppliers with sufficient assessment results, 6 suppliers with poor assessment results, and 5 suppliers with very poor assessment results.