Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Perkara Korupsi Dalam Rangka Percepatan Penyelamatan Uang Negara

Abstract

Regulations governing the crime of corruption has changed several times. This is done to reach a modus operandi of various criminal acts of corruption and minimize the legal gaps that can be used as an excuse for the perpetrators of corruption to be able to detach himself from the shackles of law. Investigation, prosecution and examination before the court in a corruption case precedence over any other case to completion as soon as possible. In the Law of Criminal Acts of Corruption, the loss state is enough to capture perpetrators of corruption. Perpetrators of corruption have the right to prove that he did not commit corruption. Even so, the prosecutor still must prove the charges. Greater accountability of corruption, namely the possibility of imposition of penalty in absentia, the possibility of seizure of goods that had been seized for a defendant who has died before a verdict can not be changed again, the formulation of a broad scope of the offense, the expansion of the interpretation of the word "embezzle "the offense of embezzlement. Keyword : corruption, financial state, criminal responsibility

Corruption Loops in Indonesia During 2004-2019 (The Need for Protection Whistleblower)

“…Corruption is a crime committed by bribery, processing, and unlawful acts that harm or can harm the state's finances or the country's economy, harm the welfare or interests of the people (Beridiansyah, 2017). Corruption is behavior that benefits self-interest at the expense of others by government officials who directly violate the legal boundaries of this behavior (Hafidz, 2015). Klitgaard in Hafidz (2015) sees corruption as behavior that deviates from the official duties of a state position because of status gains or money Basically, corruption is understood as an act of a public official who abuses authority for personal, family, crony, and group interests, resulting in state losses.…”

“…Corruption is behavior that benefits self-interest at the expense of others by government officials who directly violate the legal boundaries of this behavior (Hafidz, 2015). Klitgaard in Hafidz (2015) sees corruption as behavior that deviates from the official duties of a state position because of status gains or money Basically, corruption is understood as an act of a public official who abuses authority for personal, family, crony, and group interests, resulting in state losses. The most important effort to eradicate corruption is the "moral" movement which continuously promotes that corruption is a grave crime against humanity that violates human dignity.…”

Challenges to the Application of the Role of Judges in Mediation of Recovering State Financial Losses in Indonesia

“…Corruption often involves a wide network of individuals and institutions. The perpetrators of corruption may have political connections, influence, or protection that allows them to remain protected or even continue to commit acts of corruption (Jawade Hafidz, 2013). In some cases, repressive handling is hampered by systemic corruption involving law enforcement agencies or law enforcement officials themselves (Indriyanto Seno Adji, 2009).…”

Legalitas Penyitaan Aset Yang Diperoleh Dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum

“…Pasal 32,33,dan 34 UU PTPK menyebutkan bahwa perampasan asset juga bisa dilakukan dalam hal apabila penyidik berpendapat bukti yang tidak memadai, kematian terdakwa baik selama penyelidikan atau pemeriksaan pengadilan, dan kerugian nyata dari pendapatan negara merupakan unsur pidana. Dalam keadaan seperti itu, penuntut umum atau penyidik segera mengirimkan salinan berkas perkara kepada jaksa penuntut umum atau pihak yang dirugikan untuk memulai gugatan perdata terhadap ahli warisnya [12]. Sesuai dengan UU TPTPK Pasal 38B, ayat (1) dan (2), jika terdakwa tidak dapat menunjukkan bahwa hartanya tidak diperoleh melalui tindak pidana korupsi, maka dapat dilakukan penyitaan harta kekayaan tindak pidana korupsi.…”