1999
DOI: 10.1128/jb.181.6.1920-1923.1999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Loop L3 of Sucrose Porin ScrY Leads to Changes in Substrate Selectivity

Abstract: The difference in substrate selectivity of the maltodextrin (LamB) and sucrose (ScrY) porins is attributed mainly to differences in loop L3, which is supposed to constrict the lumen of the pores. We show that even a single mutation (D201Y) in loop L3 leads to a narrowing of the substrate range of ScrY to that resembling LamB. In addition, we removed the putative N-terminal coiled-coil structure of ScrY and studied the effect of this deletion on sucrose transport.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confer sucrose specificity to LamB, two triple mutants were designed based on sequence and structural comparisons between LamB and ScrY, while the design of the double alanine mutant aimed for a channel with a large cross-section. In agreement with earlier results (Luckey and Nikaido, 1980;Ulmke et al, 1999), both translocation assays demonstrate that there is virtually no sucrose permeation through LamB. It has been demonstrated by X-ray structure analysis (Wang et al, 1997) that the fructose moiety of sucrose is indeed too large to translocate through the LamB channel, whereas the glucose moiety inserts partly into the channel constriction and blocks the channel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To confer sucrose specificity to LamB, two triple mutants were designed based on sequence and structural comparisons between LamB and ScrY, while the design of the double alanine mutant aimed for a channel with a large cross-section. In agreement with earlier results (Luckey and Nikaido, 1980;Ulmke et al, 1999), both translocation assays demonstrate that there is virtually no sucrose permeation through LamB. It has been demonstrated by X-ray structure analysis (Wang et al, 1997) that the fructose moiety of sucrose is indeed too large to translocate through the LamB channel, whereas the glucose moiety inserts partly into the channel constriction and blocks the channel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The reverse operation, replacement of ScrY porin residues by structurally equivalent LamB residues, has been performed recently (Ulmke et al, 1999). As analyzed in vivo, the ScrY mutants did not exhibit an improved apparent transport K m for maltose.…”
Section: Crystal Structure Of the Triple Mutant Lamby1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transplanting these ScrY residues to LamB resulted in a wider channel, allowing transport of the more bulky sucrose molecule, which is not able to permeate through the wild‐type LamB porin (own unpublished data). The opposite was observed when Asp‐201 of ScrY was replaced by the corresponding LamB residue (Ulmke et al ., 1999). This mutation led to a narrowing of the substrate range of ScrY to that resembling LamB.…”
Section: Substrate‐specific Porinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein modelling of the WT allele show that the NTC domain extends from the periplasm inwards into the porin and interacts with the inner loop 3 (L3), which traverses the upper region of the OmpU towards to the extracellular side. Domains analogous to NTC and L3 in other porins contribute to pore size and altered open and close conformation states [37,[62][63][64][65][66][67]. Given our findings, it is likely that the presence of the N-terminal coil contributes to a smaller pore size [37] in the WT allele leading to exclusion of bile molecules in contrast to the sensitive alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%