2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Effects on Ground Motion Directionality: Lessons from Case Studies in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of the evaluation is to find 1D-like sites that can be used for the calibration of D mul and σ ln V S and thus remove the δ 1 D s SRA component in Equation 4. Therefore, the inter-event variability, indicative of the azimuthal variations in the velocity structure (Pilz et al, 2022; Ramos-Sepúlveda and Cabas, 2021), is not used in the evaluation. The correlation coefficient is computed at five frequency ranges: (1) from the first to the second TF peak, (2) from the first to the third TF peak (e.g.…”
Section: Identification Of 1d-like Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the evaluation is to find 1D-like sites that can be used for the calibration of D mul and σ ln V S and thus remove the δ 1 D s SRA component in Equation 4. Therefore, the inter-event variability, indicative of the azimuthal variations in the velocity structure (Pilz et al, 2022; Ramos-Sepúlveda and Cabas, 2021), is not used in the evaluation. The correlation coefficient is computed at five frequency ranges: (1) from the first to the second TF peak, (2) from the first to the third TF peak (e.g.…”
Section: Identification Of 1d-like Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%