1986
DOI: 10.2307/1368917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Fidelity and Habitat Quality as Determinants of Settlement Pattern in Male Painted Buntings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
4
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
66
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The return rate of 44% for males is within the range of 7%-66% reported for other long-term studies of migratory passerines in North America (e.g., Best and Rodenhouse 1984;Lanyon and Thompson 1986;DiQuinzio et al 2001;Beheler et al 2003;Howlett and Stutchbury 2003;Sedgwick 2004;Schlossberg 2009), and our site fidelity of 31% is lower than the 50%-76% reported in the same studies. However, comparisons are sometimes difficult to make because some studies do not clearly define the methodology used to determine return rates and site fidelity and because differences in habitat and behaviour could also account for differences in return rates and site fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The return rate of 44% for males is within the range of 7%-66% reported for other long-term studies of migratory passerines in North America (e.g., Best and Rodenhouse 1984;Lanyon and Thompson 1986;DiQuinzio et al 2001;Beheler et al 2003;Howlett and Stutchbury 2003;Sedgwick 2004;Schlossberg 2009), and our site fidelity of 31% is lower than the 50%-76% reported in the same studies. However, comparisons are sometimes difficult to make because some studies do not clearly define the methodology used to determine return rates and site fidelity and because differences in habitat and behaviour could also account for differences in return rates and site fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, it is unclear whether these landscape-differences in structural size are due to larger birds arriving earlier on breeding grounds and preferentially establishing territories in contiguous forest (Francis and Cooke 1986;Marra et al 1998), or as a result of larger birds actively excluding smaller birds from these habitats, irrespective of arrival dates (Nolan 1978;Lanyon and Thompson 1986). Alternatively, if Ovenbird populations in contiguous forest return to their natal habitats, individuals in contiguous forest could be larger as a result of being raised in higher-quality habitats (Ulfstrand et al 1981).…”
Section: Landscape and Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familiarity with a territory might also decrease the probability of predation for the territory owner (Metzgar 1967), particularly if stable refuges from predators were present and the discovery of those refuges required a significant investment of time and energy. Finally, an individual returning to a previously held territory might have an advantage in defending it against intruders or other claimants due to some prior residency effect (Greenwood 1980;Krebs 1982;Lanyon and Thompson 1986;Jakobsson 1988; Thompson and Hale 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%