2021
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site index as a predictor of the effect of climate warming on boreal tree growth

Abstract: With a predicted rise in global temperatures and a predicted increase in the frequency and intensity of droughts by many climate scenarios (IPCC, 2013), the boreal forest would be the biome most strongly affected by global warming (Price et al., 2013). An increase of mean annual temperature between 4° and 11°C was projected across the boreal forest by the end of this century, adding to an already observed increase of 1.5°C during the past century (Gauthier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(102 reference statements)
6
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, compared to models alimented with field-based data, our model is based upon remotely sensed data that are less monetarily costly and timeconsuming to acquire, while it can accurately predict forest regrowth rates at the sub-continental scale with much finer spatial grain. In any event, the predicted height growth rates of our model are very consistent with those found in previous studies of the boreal forests (i.e., mostly comprised between 10 and 40 cm.year -1 ; Pedlar & McKenney 2017;Oboite & Comeau 2019;Pau et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Second, compared to models alimented with field-based data, our model is based upon remotely sensed data that are less monetarily costly and timeconsuming to acquire, while it can accurately predict forest regrowth rates at the sub-continental scale with much finer spatial grain. In any event, the predicted height growth rates of our model are very consistent with those found in previous studies of the boreal forests (i.e., mostly comprised between 10 and 40 cm.year -1 ; Pedlar & McKenney 2017;Oboite & Comeau 2019;Pau et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings complemented those of Jucker et al (2020) who review the benefits of boreal tree diversity towards growth because of niche complementarity and those of Wu et al (2012) who advocate for lower stand densities to mitigate impacts on growth and tree mortality from anticipated droughts. We also found that sandy soils with faster drainage limited growth of black spruce and jack pine, an indication that increased moisture stress could affect growth of these tree species in the future, although the impact would likely vary under different climate change scenarios (Pau et al 2022). Our research revealed complex interactions across the double gradient of tree species diversity and soil texture but generally support management practices that maintain or enhance tree species diversity and mitigate intraspecific competition to decrease forest vulnerability to anthropogenic climate change and its indirect influence on insect disturbances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This finding likely reflects shallow black spruce rooting systems (Mekontchou et al 2020) and low adaptability to dry atmospheric conditions (Marchand et al 2021), indicating that spruce is more susceptible to summer heat stress and associated lower moisture availability in the soil and air, respectively. Conversely, jack pine growth could respond positively under moderate temperature-increase scenarios (Pau et al 2022).…”
Section: Explaining Individual Tree Growthmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of non-static factors, such as increasing nitrogen deposition and rising temperatures and CO 2 concentrations, has been recognized as the main cause of site productivity increases (Nunes et al, 2015;de Wergifosse et al, 2022). Site index is a good indicator of the effect of climate change on tree growth and site productivity (Socha et al, 2016;Pau et al, 2022). The ability to capture changes in productivity using differences in SI values is due to the different responses of trees of different ages to changes in growth conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%