1988
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(88)90594-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site interconversion in chemisorbed CO on Ni(111): IRAS and work function studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
50
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the fact that in each case, when SRT was compared with the experimental beam-dosing adsorption results, at least one apparatus constant had to be inferred, it is not possible to establish error bounds on the determination of the cross section. However, the agreement between the theoretical predictions and the measurements of Froitzheim and Köhler, 22 Surnev et al 24 and Rubloff, 1 indicates that the cross section is independent of coverage and pressure. The indication that the cross section has a constant value implies that all of the material properties needed to describe the kinetics of CO-Ni͑111͒ adsorption have been identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the fact that in each case, when SRT was compared with the experimental beam-dosing adsorption results, at least one apparatus constant had to be inferred, it is not possible to establish error bounds on the determination of the cross section. However, the agreement between the theoretical predictions and the measurements of Froitzheim and Köhler, 22 Surnev et al 24 and Rubloff, 1 indicates that the cross section is independent of coverage and pressure. The indication that the cross section has a constant value implies that all of the material properties needed to describe the kinetics of CO-Ni͑111͒ adsorption have been identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For this reason, the coverage values given in Ref. 24 have been multiplied by a factor of 0.524/0.5.…”
Section: B Examination Of the Co-ni(111) Measurements Reported By Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the bands due to carbonate formation, those due to adsorbed CO appeared at 2014 and 1844 cm −1 ; these are assigned to linearly adsorbed CO (denoted as "l-CO") and bridge-type adsorbed CO (denoted as "b-CO"), respectively [13]. When hydrogen was added to the flowing CO 2 (b), the bands due to adsorbed CO were intensified significantly, and new bands appeared at 2055 cm −1 and 1936 cm −1 ; these are assigned to weakly adsorbed l-CO and l-CO on edge sites of Ni metal particles [14,15]. It is considered that after CO 2 introduction, CO 2 adsorbed on Ni sites was dissociated to CO(a) and O(a) to a large extent, and when hydrogen was introduced to the surface, adsorbed oxygen was immediately removed from the Ni surface due to the reaction with hydrogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO on cobalt, rhodium, and nickel single crystal surfaces often exhibits considerable bridge binding, even, as in the case of Ni͑111͒, 30 to the preclusion of atop binding. In the case of vicinal Ni͑110͒ surfaces, surf was found to be 2020 cm −1 for atop adsorption near step edges, where the metal-metal coordination is lower than on the terraces.…”
Section: Comparison With Co Adsorbed On Surfaces and Supported Nanmentioning
confidence: 99%