2020
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2019.1707129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site selection for Croatian low and intermediate level radioactive waste repository

Abstract: Radioactive waste disposal and management presents a unique problem at the Krško nuclear power plant as it is built and co-owned by the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Slovenia. Each country is responsible for the management of half of the low-and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LILW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF). So far, Slovenia has officially selected the site for LILW disposal and the Croatian programme has a single location left (since 1999), not officially approved as acceptable. This paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the Croatian geological environment, climate, and other factors for the disposal facility site selection (Perković et al, 2020), the probable concept for the disposal facility in Croatia will be either a "Surface concrete vault", a "Near-surface closed concrete vault" or a "Deeper concrete vault" (see Table 2). The selection of these concepts lies in the existing plans for the construction of the future LILW repository in Croatia (Schaller, 1997), and that some concepts are outdated and cannot be considered safe enough (Trench -unlined; Trench -lined; Mound; Near-surface domed concrete vault ; Near-surface open concrete vault), potentially intended for small amounts of material (Shallow borehole; Deep borehole), there are no suitable facilities in Croatia (Deeper underground space -converted mine) or the conceptual solution assumes high investments, may include potential problems with the complex geological environment or complex geotechnical works (Deeper concrete vault; Underground silo; Shallow underground space; Deeper underground space -purpose-built tunnel/cavern; Deeper underground space -purpose-built silo).…”
Section: Examples Of Concepts For Near-surface Lilw Disposal Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the Croatian geological environment, climate, and other factors for the disposal facility site selection (Perković et al, 2020), the probable concept for the disposal facility in Croatia will be either a "Surface concrete vault", a "Near-surface closed concrete vault" or a "Deeper concrete vault" (see Table 2). The selection of these concepts lies in the existing plans for the construction of the future LILW repository in Croatia (Schaller, 1997), and that some concepts are outdated and cannot be considered safe enough (Trench -unlined; Trench -lined; Mound; Near-surface domed concrete vault ; Near-surface open concrete vault), potentially intended for small amounts of material (Shallow borehole; Deep borehole), there are no suitable facilities in Croatia (Deeper underground space -converted mine) or the conceptual solution assumes high investments, may include potential problems with the complex geological environment or complex geotechnical works (Deeper concrete vault; Underground silo; Shallow underground space; Deeper underground space -purpose-built tunnel/cavern; Deeper underground space -purpose-built silo).…”
Section: Examples Of Concepts For Near-surface Lilw Disposal Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Social/ economical Buildingsfacilities-build up areas (area) (km) A waste disposal site for hazardous waste such as soil contaminated by depleted uranium (DU) should be located at least 500 m away from the permanently populated area [21]. The protection of cultural heritage from RW repository should be maintained [22]. Therefore, 500 m buffer was considered as excluded area for monument sub-criterion.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%