2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific adjustment of a NWP-based photovoltaic production forecast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to specifying the uncertainty of a forecast, information about the past performance could also be used to improve the forecast itself, for example by multiplying the forecast by 1 1+Q 2 to correct a bias if there is one. Böök and Lindfors (2020) instead suggest to adjust the forecast by "daily sets of independent adjustment coefficients C N for each hour N," which are calculated from the 90th percentiles of observed and forecasted power output in a sliding window of 30 days before the current date. This approach can, to some extent, compensate systematic errors not accounted for in the model, such as shadowing, inaccurate site metadata or systematic deviations in the environmental conditions at the site from the corresponding NWP.…”
Section: Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to specifying the uncertainty of a forecast, information about the past performance could also be used to improve the forecast itself, for example by multiplying the forecast by 1 1+Q 2 to correct a bias if there is one. Böök and Lindfors (2020) instead suggest to adjust the forecast by "daily sets of independent adjustment coefficients C N for each hour N," which are calculated from the 90th percentiles of observed and forecasted power output in a sliding window of 30 days before the current date. This approach can, to some extent, compensate systematic errors not accounted for in the model, such as shadowing, inaccurate site metadata or systematic deviations in the environmental conditions at the site from the corresponding NWP.…”
Section: Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the application of knowledge about the past forecast quality to specify the uncertainty of a forecast was discussed. Additionally, the suggestion by Böök and Lindfors (2020) represents another sensible post-processing step that could mitigate both shortcomings of the forecast method used as well as effects not accounted for in the model, such as shadowing, panel aging, soiling, or imprecise parameters.…”
Section: Concluding Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular data analysis tools like principal component analysis (PCA) to construct suitable dataset for multivariate analysis of solar irradiance prediction are adopted in some earlier works [10], [11], [12]. Some earlier works show using domain knowledge based deep learning method [13], short term predictive models [14], Pearson's correlation based prediction [15], prediction with adjusting the site-specific photovoltaic (PV) output forecast [16] to predict the solar radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, photovoltaic (PV) systems have been used intensively in distribution networks worldwide to generate electric power from sunlight beside the load centers. The total worldwide capacity of PV has experienced approximately exponential progress in the earlier decades, cumulative from 39 GWp in 2010 to 480 GWp in 2018 while the typical PV installation costs reducing from 4621 USD/kWp to 1210 USD/kWp for the same duration [ 1 ]. European Union (EU) follows an ambitious strategy to be the world leader in the sector of renewable energy by 2030 [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%