Situated political innovation: explaining the historical emergence of new modes of political practice

Abstract

Scholars have recognized that contentious political action typically draws on relatively stable scripts for the enactment of claims making. But if such repertoires of political practice are generally reproduced over time, why and how do new modes of practice emerge? Employing a pragmatist perspective on social action, this article argues that change in political repertoires can be usefully understood as a result of situated political innovation-i.e., of the creative recombination of existing practices, through experimentation over time, by interacting political agents for whom old repertoires were proving inadequate to the changing context of action. The utility of this approach is demonstrated by applying it to explain the historical emergence of a new set of populist mobilizing practices in early twentieth-century Peru. The results have implications for the study of political action and historical change.The question of political stability and change is of longstanding sociological concern. Marx's (1969 [1852], 1968 [1871]) political sociology famously foregrounded the dramatic transformation of political structures; and subsequent studies of revolutions, regime transitions, political institutional change, voter Theor Soc

Pastoral Ministry in Unsettled Times: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Clergy during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Will the practices and creative solutions outlined here disappear when the constraints associated with COVID-19 are removed, or will some of these new practices prove “sticky,” ultimately expanding the cultural toolkits of pastors and congregations? Existing research on cultural change suggests that new practices become routinized and habituated only when they are recognized as useful solutions to emergent and persistent problems (Gross 2009 ; Jansen 2016 ). Will the new strategies pastors implemented during COVID continue to be deemed useful post-pandemic?…”

Racist Encounters: A Pragmatist Semiotic Analysis of Interaction

“…Showing the use-value of Peircean semiotics provides leverage to think more broadly about the potential contribution of pragmatism to social science—as well as the recursive ways in which pragmatist notions need to be sharpened and changed as they are used to analyze the social world. The pragmatist revival in sociology over the past decade has been mostly located in methodological debates and metatheoretical arguments about the theory of action (with a few exceptions, see Daipha 2015; Jansen 2016). These debates have been productive, but the approach we present here shows the utility of pragmatism not only to claim that people should be conceived as “problem solvers” but also to demonstrate how they go about defining and solving the challenges they face in interaction.…”

Emprendedurismo, movilización social e innovación: la gestión de residuos en municipios argentinos

“…La innovación se presenta, así, como una recombinación y reorganización de prácticas, de distintos lugares y tiempos, de algo nuevo que tiene sentido y que es útil en su contexto. La innovación está dada en esta posibilidad de unir prácticas internamente coherentes y adecuadas para determinada situación (Jansen, 2016).…”

“…Desde lo que podemos llamar el enfoque de la movilización social, la innovación no procede de un emprendedor sino de la movilización, el levantamiento público y la organización espontánea de actores colectivos y de la forma en que los gobernantes interpretan esa acción colectiva y la transforman en política pública (Moulaert et al, 2013). Los actores colectivos aparecen aquí como protagonistas destacados, ya que son quienes llevan a primer plano sus experiencias de vida para responder creativamente a situaciones en las cuales se ven envueltos (Jansen, 2016). Esto ocurre especialmente cuando se percibe que ciertas necesidades no son satisfechas ni por el estado ni por el sector privado (Defourny y Nyssens, 2013).…”