“…The Six Sigma methodology can also reduce the complexity of other supply chain performance measurement systems such as Supply Chain Operation Reference Model, which was recommended by the literature (Barber, 2008). As a top-down approach (Klefsjo et al, 2001) and its acquisition and transformation perspectives (McAdam and Hazlett, 2010), business transformation may be required to promote Six Sigma (Al-Mishari and Sulimans, 2008) and the approach is also heavily dependent on the collation and availability of factual and disciplined benchmarking and performance measurement information, training and education, top management commitment and leadership (Suresh et al, 2012;Kumar et al, 2011;Hilton and Sohal, 2012) but the rewards are as developed learning capabilities within managers and employees (Manville et al, 2012), increased customer satisfaction, reduced operation cost, increased revenue and improved processes (Kumar et al, 2006Andersson et al, 2006;Miguel and Anderietta, 2009;Antony and Desai, 2009;Thomas, 2006) although it is recognised as being potentially time consuming and complex (Chakrabarty and Chuan, 2009;Bendell, 2006) and the cost of training and infrastructure can create limitations (Antony, 2006). It was indicated that effective application of Six Sigma can help firms choose their competitive positioning such as focusing on internal efficiencies or differentiation strategies (Malik and Blumenfeld, 2012).…”