1986
DOI: 10.2307/1380997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and Function of Mammalian Testes in Relation to Body Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
443
3
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 508 publications
(487 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
36
443
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative testes size is a useful indicator of probable female promiscuity in the absence of more direct evidence, because it is well established that species with multi-male or promiscuous mating systems typically have relatively large testes for their body size (RTS . 1), whereas those with monogamous or polygynous (single male) mating systems typically have relatively small testes (RTS , 1) (Kenagy & Trombulak 1986; see also Harcourt et al 1981;Møller 1989). With the possible exception of Meles meles (Evans et al 1989), data on relative testes size were broadly consistent with available genetic evidence.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative testes size is a useful indicator of probable female promiscuity in the absence of more direct evidence, because it is well established that species with multi-male or promiscuous mating systems typically have relatively large testes for their body size (RTS . 1), whereas those with monogamous or polygynous (single male) mating systems typically have relatively small testes (RTS , 1) (Kenagy & Trombulak 1986; see also Harcourt et al 1981;Møller 1989). With the possible exception of Meles meles (Evans et al 1989), data on relative testes size were broadly consistent with available genetic evidence.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…A promiscuous mating system is here broadly defined as one in which females typically mate with more than one male within a given oestrus period (Clutton-Brock 1989); (ii) genetic evidence for multiple paternity within litters conceived under natural or semi-natural conditions; and/or (iii) relatively large mean testes size. To determine whether testes were relatively large compared with an average male mammal of the same order and body size, I used the relative testes size (RTS) values calculated by Kenagy & Trombulak (1986), based on regression equations for mean species body and testes mass across a range of mammalian orders. Relative testes size is a useful indicator of probable female promiscuity in the absence of more direct evidence, because it is well established that species with multi-male or promiscuous mating systems typically have relatively large testes for their body size (RTS .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males of many bat species are, however, well equipped with relatively large testes, which has been interpreted as an adaptive response to postcopulatory sexual selection (Hosken 1997(Hosken , 1998Wilkinson & McCracken 2003). Testicular tissue can represent a substantive energetic investment (Kenagy & Trombulak 1986), and an extraordinary range of combined testes mass has been documented across bat species: from 0.12 to 8.4% of body mass, which exceeds that of any other mammalian order (Wilkinson & McCracken 2003). Primates by comparison, which have been widely used as evidence that sexual selection influences testes size, exhibit combined testis mass ranging only from 0.02 to 0.75% of body mass (Harvey & Harcourt 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they are non-orthogonal), a sequential (type I) sum of squares was used, adding the two predictors to the models in the following order: body mass, testes mass. For the graphical representation of RTS (figure 1), and for the calculation of RTS values in table 1, and only in these cases, RTS was calculated using Kenagy and Trombulak's rodent-specific regression equation: RTS ¼ testes mass/0.031 Â body mass 0.77 [43].…”
Section: (G) Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%