1986
DOI: 10.1080/02786828608959110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and Generation Rate of Sidestream Cigarette Smoke Particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…MMD values reported in the literature are in the approximate range of 0.3-0.7 µm for mainstream smoke (Chang et al 1985;Anderson et al 1989;Chung and Dunn-Rankin 1996), 0.2-0.5 µm for sidestream smoke (Ueno and Peters 1986;Ingebrethsen and Sears 1989;Chung and Dunn-Rankin 1996), and 0.2-0.5 µm for ETS Sextro et al 1991, as reported in Nazaroff et al 1993;Kleeman et al 1999), with reported GSD values in the approximate range of 1-2. In spite of the variation in these reported results, ETS particle emissions appear to have a fairly narrow and identifiable distribution.…”
Section: Estimates Of the Ets Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…MMD values reported in the literature are in the approximate range of 0.3-0.7 µm for mainstream smoke (Chang et al 1985;Anderson et al 1989;Chung and Dunn-Rankin 1996), 0.2-0.5 µm for sidestream smoke (Ueno and Peters 1986;Ingebrethsen and Sears 1989;Chung and Dunn-Rankin 1996), and 0.2-0.5 µm for ETS Sextro et al 1991, as reported in Nazaroff et al 1993;Kleeman et al 1999), with reported GSD values in the approximate range of 1-2. In spite of the variation in these reported results, ETS particle emissions appear to have a fairly narrow and identifiable distribution.…”
Section: Estimates Of the Ets Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In alignment with our study, Ueno and Peters (1986) and Chang et al (1985) report equivalent total mass emissions from real-time instruments (using an electrical mobility analyzer and condensation nucleii counter) that are substantially smaller than determinations based on direct mass measurements (a cascade impactor in their case). Chang et al (1985) found that when their primary dilution ratio for mainstream smoke was increased from 6 to 18, the equivalent TPM measured from their electrical mobility analyzer decreased dramatically (18 mg/cigarette down to 2.0 mg/cigarette), while the TPM measured with the cascade impactor remained approximately the same (19-21 mg/cigarette).…”
Section: Estimates Of Size-integrated Emission Factorsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The particle fraction of diesel exhaust ranges from 5 to 500 nm (Kittelson, 1998). Cigarette smoke particles are typically considered to have a mass mean diameter ranging from 250 to 350 nm (Keith, 1982) with a mean geometric diameter of 170 nm (Ueno & Peters, 1986). Bernstein (2004) summarized a number of studies that reported a consistent mean value of cigarette smoke particle size surrounded by a wide distribution of values ranging from 18 nm to 1.6 m. For potentially toxic aerosols, determining the branch-averaged and local deposition characteristics of fine and ultrafine particles is a critical first step in making accurate predictions of the dose received and the resulting local and systemic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%