2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and shape dependence study of magnetization reversal in magnetic antidot lattice arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mainly, antidot lattices are investigated in magnetic thin films with in-plane anisotropy where the strong influence of the nanostructures due to emergent demagnetization fields at the hole edges is obvious [12]. This is widely used to tune the magnetic anisotropy [13][14][15] and coercivity [16][17][18] of these thin films, and the microscopic origin is well established in literature [15,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. To gain an understanding of the processes involved in the magnetization reversal a multitude of approaches have been combined, namely, micromagnetic simulations [15,19,20], magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements [23,24], photo electron emission microscopy (PEEM) with x-ray circular dichroism (XMCD) contrast [21], scanning x-ray microscopy (SXM) with XMCD contrast [24], and first-order reversal curve (FORC) measurements [19,22,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainly, antidot lattices are investigated in magnetic thin films with in-plane anisotropy where the strong influence of the nanostructures due to emergent demagnetization fields at the hole edges is obvious [12]. This is widely used to tune the magnetic anisotropy [13][14][15] and coercivity [16][17][18] of these thin films, and the microscopic origin is well established in literature [15,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. To gain an understanding of the processes involved in the magnetization reversal a multitude of approaches have been combined, namely, micromagnetic simulations [15,19,20], magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements [23,24], photo electron emission microscopy (PEEM) with x-ray circular dichroism (XMCD) contrast [21], scanning x-ray microscopy (SXM) with XMCD contrast [24], and first-order reversal curve (FORC) measurements [19,22,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micromagnetic simulation found widespread use and indicated complex intermediate magnetization patterns during magnetization reversal [18][19][20][21]. On the other hand, microscopic investigations have been conducted by others using magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements [22] and photoelectron emission microscopy (PEEM) [16,23] using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) as contrast mechanism. These studies also indicate the complex intermediate magnetization states, but are limited in spatial resolution [22] or the imperfect lattice order in self-organized antidot lattices [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, microscopic investigations have been conducted by others using magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements [22] and photoelectron emission microscopy (PEEM) [16,23] using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) as contrast mechanism. These studies also indicate the complex intermediate magnetization states, but are limited in spatial resolution [22] or the imperfect lattice order in self-organized antidot lattices [23]. Another approach to elucidating the reversal mechanisms are first-order reversal curves (FORC) [18,21,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antidots shape-dependent demagnetizing energy plays an important role. Bedanta and Mallick have certified the effect of some kinds of antidot on domains by experiment which is related to the effective anisotropy field [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%