1989
DOI: 10.1080/02786828908959235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Characterization of Carbonaceous Particles Using a Lovelace Multijet Cascade Impactor / Parallel-Flow Diffusion Battery Serial Sampling Train

Abstract: A serial sampling train consisting of a Lovelace multijet cascade impactor (LMJI) and a seven cell parallel-flow diffusion battery (PFDB) has been used to provide a comprehensive method for suing aerosols with a wide size distribution ranging from less than 0.01 pm to over 10 pm. The fraction of the aerosol greater than 0.7 pm is collected by the impactor. The remaining fraction of the aerosol is sampled by the PFDB. Design of the PFDB is based on the theory of a screen-type diffusion battery. The concept of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the BDE particles in the present study was 3.6 µm MMAD for the large-size fraction, 0.10 µm MMDD for the small-size fraction, and 0.44 µm MMAD for the combined fractions, averaged across all samples and exposure levels. The bimodal size distribution was similar to that observed previously in PDE exposures using the same dilution tunnel and similar distribution systems (Cheng et al, 1984;Barr et al, 1989;Nikula et al, 1995), except that the size of the larger fraction for PDE was approximately 2.0 µm MMAD. The reason for the larger MMAD of the BDE large-size fraction cannot be determined from existing data; the PDE exposures used different engines and operating cycles as well as different fuel, so the studies are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the BDE particles in the present study was 3.6 µm MMAD for the large-size fraction, 0.10 µm MMDD for the small-size fraction, and 0.44 µm MMAD for the combined fractions, averaged across all samples and exposure levels. The bimodal size distribution was similar to that observed previously in PDE exposures using the same dilution tunnel and similar distribution systems (Cheng et al, 1984;Barr et al, 1989;Nikula et al, 1995), except that the size of the larger fraction for PDE was approximately 2.0 µm MMAD. The reason for the larger MMAD of the BDE large-size fraction cannot be determined from existing data; the PDE exposures used different engines and operating cycles as well as different fuel, so the studies are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The time for NO x to reach 90% of the target value was 14 min. Particle size distribution was measured in each chamber using a combination of a Lovelace multijet cascade impactor (LMJ; Newton et al, 1977) and a parallel-flow diffusion battery (PFDB; Cheng et al, 1984;Barr et al, 1989) operated in series at a flow rate of approximately 12 L/min. For calculation of size distribution, the fraction collected by the PFDB was treated as if it had been collected by the final filter normally used with the LMJ impactor.…”
Section: Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barr, et al, (25) There is a very substantial body of research concerning reducing the data in order to find the actual size distribution from a diffusion battery. The primary problems are that the equations for reducing the data are ill-posed and non-linear.…”
Section: Parallel Flow Diffusion Battery (Pfdb)mentioning
confidence: 99%