2012
DOI: 10.1021/jp301453w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Dependence of Inter- and Intracluster Interactions in Core–Shell Iron–Iron Oxide Nanoclusters

Abstract: The room-temperature magnetic properties of core–shell iron–iron oxide nanoclusters (NCs) synthesized by a cluster deposition system were investigated, and their dependence on mean cluster size is discussed. In this study, the surface/boundary spins of clusters were not frozen and were thermally activated during the measurements. The intercluster interactions between clusters and intracluster interactions between the iron core (ferromagnetic) and iron oxide shell (ferrimagnetic) were investigated by field-depe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29 These values are typical and have been confirmed on similar samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). 36 In this sample after irradiation (S2-i), the Fe core shrinks slightly to 7 nm but the shell transformed to FeO with crystallite size 13 nm, as determined by whole pattern fitting. As seen by TEM ( Figure 4, discussed below), this crystallite size is no longer just the shell thickness but represents the FeO matrix between two Fe cores.…”
Section: Results and Discussion A Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…29 These values are typical and have been confirmed on similar samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). 36 In this sample after irradiation (S2-i), the Fe core shrinks slightly to 7 nm but the shell transformed to FeO with crystallite size 13 nm, as determined by whole pattern fitting. As seen by TEM ( Figure 4, discussed below), this crystallite size is no longer just the shell thickness but represents the FeO matrix between two Fe cores.…”
Section: Results and Discussion A Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Iron aluminide nanoparticles of 10.8 nm (±2.5 nm) display a high saturation magnetization (Ms) of 204 emu g −1 at 10 K and 170 emu g −1 at 300 K. This value of Ms is among the highest value reported so far for iron aluminide materials [18][19][20] and is much higher than that of iron oxide with similar size (typical range from 70 to 110 emu g −1 ). 21,22 Interestingly, our iron aluminide nanoparticles display a high stability against oxidation (Figure 4, inset) compared to other iron-based nanoparticles reported in literature. 23,24 The low value below 0.5 (non-interacting particles) of the remanence ratio Mr/Ms could be explained simply by the effect of competition between the inter-and intra-particle interaction on the spin relaxation process 25 and as a result of the encapsulation by the alumina shell, which provides weak inter-particles interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…3(a)-3(d), indicating the establishment of exchange bias. 2,22 The local coercivity H C increased substantially from the room temperature value [ Fig. 3(e)].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%