2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.04.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size dependence of martensite transformation temperature in nanostructured Ni–Mn–Sn ferromagnetic shape memory alloy thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. XRD analysis reveals the formation of martensitic phase in pristine film, and the planes corresponding to martensitic structure are marked by their Miller indices [21][22][23][24]. The lattice constants a, b, and c are estimated to be about 0.4, 0.5 and 2.9 nm, which agrees with the previously reported values of lattice constants for bulk [25].…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…1. XRD analysis reveals the formation of martensitic phase in pristine film, and the planes corresponding to martensitic structure are marked by their Miller indices [21][22][23][24]. The lattice constants a, b, and c are estimated to be about 0.4, 0.5 and 2.9 nm, which agrees with the previously reported values of lattice constants for bulk [25].…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A size effect was also observed in deposited films of Ni-Mn-Sn alloys in which the ferromagnetic shape memory effect takes place in the massive state [52]. In these alloys, the influence of grain size on proceeding of MT found out also.…”
Section: Nucleation and Martensitic Transformation In Small Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Decreasing the ratio of grain size to specimen size leads to a stricter compatibility requirement and thus inhibits the martensitic phase transformation. In fact, the increase in the critical martensitic transformation stress O-Ms and the decrease in the martensite start temperature Ms for decreasing grain size-to-specimen size ratio were reported in [109, 122,71,120]. In addition, Chen and Schuh proposed another intrinsic size-dependent effect.…”
Section: Experimentally Observed Size-dependent Mechanical Responses mentioning
confidence: 90%