2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2357421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-dependent energy band gap and dielectric constant within the generalized Penn model applied to a semiconductor nanocrystallite

Abstract: We calculated size-dependent single particle energy eigenvalues, wave functions, energy band gap, and dielectric constant for a semiconductor nanocrystallite, within the framework of the two band Penn model. The finite size effects are presented as size-dependent correction terms to the energy eigenvalues and the energy band gap of the bulk semiconductor. Ours is a self-consistent calculation within the Penn model [Phys. Rev. 128, 2093 (1962)], providing a much deeper understanding of the size dependences of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental data can then be compared to theory, which is mostly focused on understanding the size depen-dence of the electronic dielectric constant ⑀ 0 . ⑀ 0 is often described within the generalized Penn Model, 12 which states that ⑀ 0 strongly decreases with decreasing size, due to an opening of the band gap for smaller Qdots ͑quantum confine-ment͒. However, recent reports have cast doubt on the validity of the Penn model, proposing that the size dependence arises from a reduction in ⑀ 0 near the Qdot surface while it remains bulklike in the inner Qdot volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data can then be compared to theory, which is mostly focused on understanding the size depen-dence of the electronic dielectric constant ⑀ 0 . ⑀ 0 is often described within the generalized Penn Model, 12 which states that ⑀ 0 strongly decreases with decreasing size, due to an opening of the band gap for smaller Qdots ͑quantum confine-ment͒. However, recent reports have cast doubt on the validity of the Penn model, proposing that the size dependence arises from a reduction in ⑀ 0 near the Qdot surface while it remains bulklike in the inner Qdot volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity factor for the microwave cell used in this experiment was (2) where was the permittivity of the PbSe QD thin film at the resonance frequency, was the width (0.9 in) and was the height (0.4 in) of the WR90 waveguide, and was the length of the resonant cell (9.136 cm). The used in this work was calculated to be 24 by the generalized Penn approximation [10,58,59] and the effective medium approximation [37,60].…”
Section: Flash-photolysis Time-resolved Microwave Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a semiconductor nanocrystal, the decrease of its dielectric constant with size reduction has been reported [25][26][27][28][29]. Such phenomenon is often attributed to the bandgap increase inside the nanocrystal.…”
Section: Static Dielectric Constant Of Nc-gementioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, when f i > 0 (i.e., nc-Ge distributed region), e i is always larger than e SiO 2 , but smaller than e ncÀGe . It should be noted that e ncÀGe is different from the dielectric constant of the bulk crystalline Ge, because the dielectric constant of a semiconductor nanocrystal decreases with reducing particle dimensions [25][26][27][28][29]. The details of e ncÀGe used in the calculation will be discussed later.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%