2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-dependent freezing temperature of metallic and semi-metallic nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the difference between the melting and crystallisation temperatures was only 2.3 °C for the bulk Sn, but 118.9 °C and 90.3 °C for the 60–80 nm and <300 nm Sn nanoparticles, respectively. Hence supercooling temperature was lower for the smallest particles, but was noticeable for both studied types 28 .
Figure 4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis of nanoencapsulation suitability and integrity.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It was observed that the difference between the melting and crystallisation temperatures was only 2.3 °C for the bulk Sn, but 118.9 °C and 90.3 °C for the 60–80 nm and <300 nm Sn nanoparticles, respectively. Hence supercooling temperature was lower for the smallest particles, but was noticeable for both studied types 28 .
Figure 4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis of nanoencapsulation suitability and integrity.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Δ G V is the free energy change per unit volume and can be expressed as Δ G V = Δ g m ( T )/ V m , where V m is the molar volume of the element, and Δ g m ( T ) can be expressed as: 34 where Δ H m means the melting enthalpy. Based on the Helmholtz free energy 23 Δ H m ( T ) = Δ g m ( T ) − Td Δ g m ( T )/d T and eqn (2), Δ H m ( T ) can be written as:Δ H m ( T ) = Δ H m ( T / T m ) 2 …”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrov et al 21 developed a freezing temperature model under the nanoscale, while some of the parameters were obtained experimentally. Zhang 22 and Li 23 studied the T f ( r ) of metallic or semi-metallic nanoparticles by considering the degree of super-cooling and classical nucleation theory. The size effect on T f ( r ) of water nanodroplets was not involved, and not considered in the case of the heterogeneous system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the difference between the melting and crystallisation temperatures was only 2.3 °C for the bulk Sn, but 118.9 °C and 90.3 °C for the 60-80 nm and <300 nm Sn nanoparticles, respectively. Hence supercooling temperature was lower for the smallest particles, but was noticeable for both studied types 59 .…”
Section: Nanoencapsulation Stability After Thermal Cycling and Maximumentioning
confidence: 83%