2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size distribution of radioactive particles collected at Tokai, Japan 6 days after the nuclear accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Input meteorological data are mainly from the surface weather stations in Fukushima Prefecture from 12 to 15 March, 2011 and show the following: 16 and −1.5 • C for air temperature, 21 and −5 • C for ground surface temperature, 800 and 0 W m −1 for solar radiation, 30 and 70 % for relative humidity during the daytime and nighttime, respectively. equivalent particle diameters are set to 0.5 and 1.5 µm for 131 I and other radionuclides, respectively, based on the observational results at JAEA-Tokai from 17 March to 1 April (Miyamoto et al, 2014) with a geometric standard deviation of 1.6 µm (Kaneyasu et al, 2012). Figure A1 illustrates the dry deposition velocity of 131 I, gaseous I 2 and CH 3 I, and particulate iodine and 137 Cs (expecting the chemical form of CsI) for grassland and forest against horizontal wind speed for a typical sunny period during the accident.…”
Section: A2 Dry Deposition Of Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input meteorological data are mainly from the surface weather stations in Fukushima Prefecture from 12 to 15 March, 2011 and show the following: 16 and −1.5 • C for air temperature, 21 and −5 • C for ground surface temperature, 800 and 0 W m −1 for solar radiation, 30 and 70 % for relative humidity during the daytime and nighttime, respectively. equivalent particle diameters are set to 0.5 and 1.5 µm for 131 I and other radionuclides, respectively, based on the observational results at JAEA-Tokai from 17 March to 1 April (Miyamoto et al, 2014) with a geometric standard deviation of 1.6 µm (Kaneyasu et al, 2012). Figure A1 illustrates the dry deposition velocity of 131 I, gaseous I 2 and CH 3 I, and particulate iodine and 137 Cs (expecting the chemical form of CsI) for grassland and forest against horizontal wind speed for a typical sunny period during the accident.…”
Section: A2 Dry Deposition Of Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, since additional or extended measurements except for Be-aerosols measured at various seasons during last six years with the same manner mentioned in the text radioactivity measurements could not been done on that occasion, all we can do in this stage is only a matter of speculation with scarce experimental evidence. There are several reports concerning size distributions of airborne radionuclides from the Fukushima accident [4][5][6][7][8][9]; in addition, for the Chernobyl accident there also exist comparable data [10][11][12][13][14][15]. For the measurements in Japan, the size distributions of radiocesium are partly different each other probably depending on the emission process from the reactors or transportation mechanism due to different sampling date and distance from the reactor site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that particulate matter (PM) was released from the FDNPP and was dispersed as an atmospheric aerosol around the globe (Malá et al ; Masson et al ; Miyamoto et al ; Muramatsu et al ). Physicochemical properties of radioactive spherical particles from the FDNPP have been documented (Adachi et al ; Niimura et al ; Abe et al ; Yamaguchi et al ).…”
Section: Second Lesson: Study Fukushima Not Radiation Alonementioning
confidence: 99%